We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Nice mortgage calculator

1911131415

Comments

  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    *Some* average wage earners could yes, as this was based on the mean 36k which less people earn with a 20% deposit, yes :)

    If the bank actually loans the money, which after all this bickering, is probably unlikely :p

    If we look at the REAL average, which I believe was 28-29k? Then, definately not, no.

    that's exacly what i said in the other thread which you mis-quoted me on here.

    lower earners would have to be stripped out of the calculation to work out the comparable average salary vs average house price.

    what you define as a low earner is the hardest bit.
  • ad9898_3
    ad9898_3 Posts: 3,858 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    Depends how long you live with them now and what parental ties you have ( I am not even sure you could kick out a partner who had children from a previous relationship, but don't quote me).

    If you're not married, they have no claim to your property.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ad9898 wrote: »
    If you're not married, they have no claim to your property.

    I believe that law as now changed. I think after X years any partner can claim like a divorce.

    (it was changed due to gay relationships etc, but i am not 100% sure on the entitlements.)
  • ad9898_3
    ad9898_3 Posts: 3,858 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    I believe that law as now changed. I think after X years any partner can claim like a divorce.

    (it was changed due to gay relationships etc, but i am not 100% sure on the entitlements.)

    Nope, trust me, this has been a myth for years, they have no chance. And so it should be.
  • bluey890
    bluey890 Posts: 1,020 Forumite
    edited 24 June 2009 at 3:44PM
    Joeskeppi wrote: »
    I'm not really sure why a FTBer should expect to buy an average priced house.

    You start off small, buy a place, pay off the mortgage for a few years and upgrade.

    Nowdays it's more a running jump and clutch the housing ladder with one hand, than a step on and upgrade.
    Favourite hobbies: Watersports. Relaxing in Coffee Shop. Investing in stocks.
    Personality type: Compassionate Male Armadillo. Sockies: None.
  • Yakubu22
    Yakubu22 Posts: 640 Forumite
    500 Posts
    michaels wrote: »
    Prices are high because people can afford them - not everyone but enough to buy up the available houses.
    ?

    A lot of people have been protected from the bubble bursting by the BOE lowering IRs to an all time low. This will not last long! Should IRs increase then prices will come down further as people are finally stung by decreasing prices and more expensive rates. That's a recipe for more people putting homes on the market, increasing supply.
    I imagine quite a few buyers of the last few years who may be in or teetering on NE have been given some reprieve by the low IRs. I wonder how many have had the forsight to realise the reprieve is only temporary.
    "For those who understand, no explanation is necessary. Those who don't understand, dont matter."
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ad9898 wrote: »
    Nope, trust me, this has been a myth for years, they have no chance. And so it should be.

    I may be thinking of civil partnerships.
  • ad9898_3
    ad9898_3 Posts: 3,858 Forumite
    bluey890 wrote: »
    Nowdays it's more a running jump and clutch the housing ladder with one hand, than a step on and updrade.

    Or maybe at the min its sit with your arms folded and watch the ladder crumble at your feet. This what doesn't make much sense about this 'ladder'. 'Upgrading' nearly always means taking on more debt, how is that a good thing ?
  • ad9898_3
    ad9898_3 Posts: 3,858 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    I may be thinking of civil partnerships.

    Now that is something different, you are correct there. Gay rights and all that, not that I know much about being gay or anything.:D
  • bluey890
    bluey890 Posts: 1,020 Forumite
    ad9898 wrote: »
    Nope, trust me, this has been a myth for years, they have no chance. And so it should be.

    I thought that if the partner could prove they contrinuted to the house, helping pay mortgage, paying for decoration, they could seek compensation from the courts.
    Not the same as a claim on the house, i know.
    Favourite hobbies: Watersports. Relaxing in Coffee Shop. Investing in stocks.
    Personality type: Compassionate Male Armadillo. Sockies: None.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.