Car insurance demand money - spouse/son error

dacouch

You never mentioned the claim.

If it involved your brother then they are less likely to reduce the amount they accept.

Get some advice from the Citizens Advice Bureau

tony_baduk

The claim was a non-fault and the insurance was cancelled subsquently.

LinasPilibaitisisbatman

tony_baduk wrote: »

The claim was a non-fault and the insurance was cancelled subsquently.

Doesnt matter. If you mislead them it could create big problems.

tony_baduk

Yes I am aware of that! Like I've said it was not intentional, we could've selected a number of insurance companies at the time but we selected ecar through recommendation.

LinasPilibaitisisbatman

Whats that go to do with anything?

As for being non intentional. even if it was you had plenty of time to notice on documents, not to mention your prize was far cheaper. would have rang alarm bells surely.

Im willing to bet if it had been in the insurers favour you would have noticed.

shelly

tony_baduk wrote: »

Their website did not have a son option.

I'm sorry to say but it was when your brother got to this point of the quote he should have either passed the company by, called them to get a quote, or as the company said itself, chose other family.
IMO because son isn't listed as a choice isn't an excuse to choose spouse instead.

LinasPilibaitisisbatman

Tbh people like the OP should either pay up or face 30 days in prison. bet they wouldnt make a "mistake" again.

I notice he still hasnt answered whose car it was and who drove it most. hmmm

tony_baduk

Well in our initial letter we've stated that we are WILLING to pay but we're just wondering if they can help with this matter in view of our circumstances. It is not a way to back out and run away!

LinasPilibaitisisbatman

There helping you by just making you repay the sum of your fraud.

tony_baduk

LinasPilibaitisisbatman wrote: »

There helping you by just making you repay the sum of your fraud.

Thank you for your sarcastic replies.