We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Changing Address with car insurance firms
Options
Comments
-
But the cheapest for us. <img src=\"http://images.moneysavingexpert.com/images/forum_images/smilies/smile.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" title=\"Smile\" smilieid=\"1\" class=\"inlineimg\" />
Result then! My premium was £139....minus £80 I got from quidco...so £59 net!0 -
I'm sorry but are jackieb and gordikin related. Are you saying that you bought the cheapest insurance yet didn't pay admin fees. Have I understood correctly?
Nevica
They were the cheapest option for us. What's cheaper for me is not necessarily cheapest for you. For gordikin they were more expensive than other insurance companies.
And no, we didn't have anything to pay with either insurance to change our address.0 -
They were the cheapest option for us. (WHO IS US?) What's cheaper for me is not necessarily cheapest for you. For gordikin they were more expensive than other insurance companies.
And no, we didn't have anything to pay with either insurance to change our address.
POINT IN NOTE TO DUNSTONH AND RASKAZZ.
This is why insurance needs more regulation. Why is it fair that some companies charge minimum and dont charge admin while others do. The plot thickens and shows itself for what it really is. As I expected!!!!! One only has to dig a little deeper to find inconsistencies in the system.
I say that the law needs to be changed to make it fairer for all involved.
Nevica0 -
They were the cheapest option for us. (WHO IS US?)
My son, with Elephant, and myself and my husband with Direct Line.0 -
Excuse me for a second Nevica.
“No, he doesn't. Read his post history” yep feel free bet I have helped more than you.
What he actually does is good old traditional British knee-jerk reactionism. (no such word as reactionism Mr Scrabble well there is but shouldn't be) His threads are full of unfocused and illogical rants against the UK financial system. When people actually debate specifics - or, heaven forbid - ask him to back up his arguments with evidence he becomes very evasive and refuses to engage in adult debate (example ?)Several threads where posters have asked for advice have been spoiled by his puerile antics (like what, when), and at least two have been deleted by the board's admin (one was mine and the other nothing to do with it being deleted nowt to do with me that was insurance bods). Add a load of nonsense about 'Zorro' and you have quite a mix, none of it good.(boring I like Zorro Amigo lol)
IIRC he takes this attitude to insurers because they didn't pay a claim for him, either because he didn't disclose facts correctly or he simply didn't understand the nature of the product that he purchased (and your evidence is what?),
I am of the opinion all IC’s are corrupt, immoral unethical and greedy if that’s what you mean rakasss.Campaigning to recycle Insurance Policies into Toilet Paper :rotfl:
Z0 -
This is why insurance needs more regulation. Why is it fair that some companies charge minimum and dont charge admin while others do. The plot thickens and shows itself for what it really is. As I expected!!!!! One only has to dig a little deeper to find inconsistencies in the system.
If I go to Tesco, I'll pay 29p for a tin of baked beans and they'll give me a free bag.
That is the whole point of business.
If you got your way, every company would have the same prices which means we'd all be paying more.
There is absolutely no excuse for not reading the policy booklet and understanding the conditions. Even if you don't read the whole booklet, at least read the Key Facts document - these usually state the admin fees.0 -
Why is it fair that some companies charge minimum and dont charge admin while others do.
Because they have a choice how to price the products they sell. Just as any other retailer does.I say that the law needs to be changed to make it fairer for all involved.
you say the law should be changed to effectively make it more expensive for most people. Not fairer. You also want to restrict consumer choice.
Why should laws be passed that restrict consumer choice and increase prices?I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
I was charged nearly £55 by Direct Line for updating my policy with my new car details. I find this a bit excessive - I'd be happy to pay £25 as that seems like a fairly reasonable charge for an admin job, but £55? Didn't have any choice in the matter though, so there you go.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards