Need some advice!

Zara33

Afternoon

Looking for a little advice if i may, i recently re applied for child support again and today i have received the breakdown of maintenance assessment and part A states Variation: £xx.xx now after getting in contact with the CSA i have been told NRP has asked for a variation due to contact costs :eek::eek::eek: !!!!!! NRP has never had contact with my son but he now has the brass balls to apply for a varation, apparently i have signed forms and agreeded to this...like hell i have!!!!

What can i do to prove NRP is basically a lying scum bag?

marksoton

Before worrying about proving anything i think you need to get to the bottom of these so called forms you are meant to have signed !

Are the CSA saying they are in possession of them or are they just taking the NRP's word for it ?

Loopy_Girl

Zara33 wrote: »

Afternoon


What can i do to prove NRP is basically a lying scum bag?

Hang on Zara, I'll get all the (allegedly;)) bitter PWC on here rounded up and we'll go and kick his knackers in:p:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

marksoton

Loopy_Girl wrote: »

Hang on Zara, I'll get all the (allegedly;)) bitter PWC on here rounded up and we'll go and kick his knackers in:p:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Allegedly !! :rotfl:

With some of your no nonsense posts recently i would say it's a certainty.

Loopy_Girl

Careful now.....tonight is vodka night and you don't want to be at the end of one of my tongue lashings!!!!!!!!:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

marksoton

Loopy_Girl wrote: »

Careful now.....tonight is vodka night and you don't want to be at the end of one of my tongue lashings!!!!!!!!:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Oh yeah, i forgot you moved buckfast to thursday nights. :rotfl:

Loopy_Girl

marksoton wrote: »

Oh yeah, i forgot you moved buckfast to thursday nights. :rotfl:

And since I took Kelloggs advice and started feeding small person gruel, it leaves me more money for Smirnoff;):rotfl::rotfl:

Suffice to say I kept my thought to myself for weeks but when an uneducated nobody accuses me of using my daughter as a weapon when they know nothing about me......well, you know, a girl has gotta stand up for herself!:D

Zara33

marksoton wrote: »

Before worrying about proving anything i think you need to get to the bottom of these so called forms you are meant to have signed !

Are the CSA saying they are in possession of them or are they just taking the NRP's word for it ?

:rolleyes: After several phone calls today to the CSA i have now been informed that the variation is for another child gawd i don't know how many times i asked the first case opeator are you sure the contact costs are for my son yes Ms Zara it's your child and it was you who signed the form are you 100% sure again yes Ms Zara.

Phone again spoke to another case operator no we cannot discuss this with you as it involves another party data protection blah blah blah!

Finally phoned again spoke to another case operator who actually seemed to know exactly what she was talking about and explained what was what.

Anyway i go on to query how the NRP partner is able to claim CSA plus they get a variation for contact costs, how can this happen when they live together, with their child so thus not actually having any contact costs. ( have emails where NRP states he and partner are going to s*rew me re CSA)

Woohoo i have been advised to appeal decision blooming nora not a good start CSA!

Zara33

Loopy_Girl wrote: »

Careful now.....tonight is vodka night and you don't want to be at the end of one of my tongue lashings!!!!!!!!:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

:eek: Vod ka ka ka care to share i think i need it more than you.

catenorfolk

why dont you tell the csa that they live together!! lol

marksoton

Zara33 wrote: »

:rolleyes: After several phone calls today to the CSA i have now been informed that the variation is for another child gawd i don't know how many times i asked the first case opeator are you sure the contact costs are for my son yes Ms Zara it's your child and it was you who signed the form are you 100% sure again yes Ms Zara.

Phone again spoke to another case operator no we cannot discuss this with you as it involves another party data protection blah blah blah!

Finally phoned again spoke to another case operator who actually seemed to know exactly what she was talking about and explained what was what.

Anyway i go on to query how the NRP partner is able to claim CSA plus they get a variation for contact costs, how can this happen when they live together, with their child so thus not actually having any contact costs. ( have emails where NRP states he and partner are going to s*rew me re CSA)

Woohoo i have been advised to appeal decision blooming nora not a good start CSA!

Hmm. Must admit i didn't realise a variation could apply to an assessment for another child that had nothing to do with the basis for that variation. In other words i thought the reduced CM only applied to the child that had the "contact costs".

Your ex has certainly thought this one through ! Looks like you will have to appeal, and i would push for them to be prosecuted.

What they have done really is the lower than low IMO.

Edit : Also that must mean you are receiving a reduced %age of his income as well !