We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

NATIONWIDE - UK house prices fall 0.4 pct mm in April

17891012

Comments

  • mitchaa
    mitchaa Posts: 4,487 Forumite
    edited 30 April 2009 at 3:53PM
    As long as you are consistent in using those figures, then fine.

    However, swapping and changing to whichever set of figures suit that month, to ramp your interests is what gets me, which is what is happening here.

    It's simple goalpost changing, which is a shame, as last month, when prices were reported as a 0.9% rise, all the bears accepted it, and we all had a good bit of banter on here. But this month, it's all change again, and massaging figures to suit, as they have gone down.

    Graham you are clearly making a fool of yourself here.

    I was shouting last month because the rise given by the Nationwide was reported at 0.9% when it should have been 2.5%. (Exactly the same as i am doing now) Exactly the same has happened this month, they have reported it at -0.4% when in fact it has increased.

    So we are keeping it at the same level so where is your evidence that we are using seasonally adjusted figures in our favour??

    Oh, my signature contains 1/4 house price moves. It is updated every 3 months in simpler terms for you Graham as regional data is not released month on month.Factual figures in my signature strip and it's there purely to wind up people like you:p
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 30 April 2009 at 3:55PM
    mitchaa wrote: »
    Graham you are clearly making a fool of yourself here.

    I was shouting last month because the rise given by the Nationwide was reported at 0.9% when it should have been 2.5%.

    Exactly the same has happened this month, they have reported it at -0.4% when in fact it has increased.

    So we are keeping it at the same level so where is your evidence that we are using seasonally adjusted figures in our favour??

    Oh, my signature contains 1/4 house price moves. It is updated every 3 months in simpler terms for you Graham as regional data is not released month on month.

    Factual figures in my signature strip and it's there purely to wind up people like you:p

    Why should it have been 2.5% last time? Why should it be increased this month?

    Because YOU want them to calculate it that way?

    YOU want them to calculate it differently to how they have always calculated it?

    This is how Nationwide have always calculated it. This is what all the data is calculated on from the Nationwide. I'm sorry it doesnt suit you personally, but no doubt one day, when they are rising again, it will. Would you want it changed then? No.

    YOU can calculate it and change it from month to month to suit how you like. But then who's making a fool of themselves? From the bulls point of view it will be me, and Im happy for you to call me a fool. However, as I said earlier, we have loads of historical data, that is what this is all based on, and I would rather it stayed that way instead of people changing it to suit themselves as and when they wish to change it. Am I making a fool of myself by sticking with the statistics how they have always been calculated? Well, thats your call.
  • mitchaa
    mitchaa Posts: 4,487 Forumite
    edited 30 April 2009 at 4:07PM
    Why should it have been 2.5% last time? Why should it be increased this month?

    Because YOU want them to calculate it that way?

    YOU want them to calculate it differently to how they have always calculated it?

    This is how Nationwide have always calculated it. This is what all the data is calculated on from the Nationwide. I'm sorry it doesnt suit you personally, but no doubt one day, when they are rising again, it will. Would you want it changed then? No.

    Grahame, Grahame, Grahame, you are clearly missing the point here, concentrate on the actual values in money terms rather than the month on month ups and downs in % terms.

    I continue to refer to this table..(Not yet updated with the latest £££ increase)

    http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/indices-nationwide-national.php

    You will see last month, house prices jumped from £147,746 upto £150,946 and was reported to be a 0.9% increase. If you are any good at maths you would see that this was infact a 2.2% increase. The exact same this month, the % figure is showing as a negative but the reality is house values in £££ terms are showing that prices increased further.

    Theoretically if you were wanting to buy the average house in Feb at a 100% LTV you would have needed to borrow £147,746. In March you would have needed to borrow £150,946 and in April you would now need to borrow £151,861

    Forget about the % figures, you can clearly see that in these 2 months you would have needed to borrow more each time to buy that same average house.

    That is the point i am getting at. I take no notice of the actual % drops or gains MOM, but i do look at the actual £££ figures along with % drops from peak.

    Over and out Graham.
  • ad9898_3
    ad9898_3 Posts: 3,858 Forumite
    This thread is great, wouldn't it be fun if the Haliwide and the LR produced figures on a daily basis, instead of monthly.:D
  • ad9898 wrote: »
    This thread is great, wouldn't it be fun if the Haliwide and the LR produced figures on a daily basis, instead of monthly.:D

    right now the stats are pretty good imo - everyone's seeing something they like in them
    Prefer girls to money
  • westv
    westv Posts: 6,515 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mitchaa wrote: »


    You will see last month, house prices jumped from £147,746 upto £150,946 and was reported to be a 0.9% increase. If you are any good at maths you would see that this was infact a 2.2% increase.

    The 0.90% is the percentage increase in the seasonally adjusted index from 298.70 to 301.50,
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    westv wrote: »
    The 0.90% is the percentage increase in the seasonally adjusted index from 298.70 to 301.50,

    Keep up icon7.gif
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • westv
    westv Posts: 6,515 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    StevieJ wrote: »
    Keep up icon7.gif

    Ok I'm running as fast as I can! :D

    Anyway mitchaa said "You will see last month, house prices jumped from £147,746 upto £150,946 and was reported to be a 0.9% increase"

    That's not correct. The average price did jump but the 0.90% relates to the seasonal index not the average price.

    Have I caught up yet? :o
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    westv wrote: »
    Ok I'm running as fast as I can! :D

    Anyway mitchaa said "You will see last month, house prices jumped from £147,746 upto £150,946 and was reported to be a 0.9% increase"

    That's not correct. The average price did jump but the 0.90% relates to the seasonal index not the average price.

    Have I caught up yet? :o

    They know that, but they are arguing (sorry discussing) the rights and wrongs of it.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.