We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Should we look further into this? Land issue.
MsConfused
Posts: 63 Forumite
Hi all,
I'd really appreciate some opinions of our situation.
My partner and I are in the process of buying our first home. The house we've put on offer on overlooks a large piece of land (were on top of a hill, so looking out across the land), which was obviously a huge selling point for us. We've just found out that part of this land has been sold in auction. We've checked with the local authority, who say that the land is designated open space and nothing can be built on it. Although that's put our mind to rest a little, I can't help but be curious as to why someone would pay a couple of thousand for land they can't build on. Should we be concerned by this? And is there any way we can find out what their intentions are for the land? I know a lot of you will think we're being nosey, but we're just worried.
Thanks for your help.
I'd really appreciate some opinions of our situation.
My partner and I are in the process of buying our first home. The house we've put on offer on overlooks a large piece of land (were on top of a hill, so looking out across the land), which was obviously a huge selling point for us. We've just found out that part of this land has been sold in auction. We've checked with the local authority, who say that the land is designated open space and nothing can be built on it. Although that's put our mind to rest a little, I can't help but be curious as to why someone would pay a couple of thousand for land they can't build on. Should we be concerned by this? And is there any way we can find out what their intentions are for the land? I know a lot of you will think we're being nosey, but we're just worried.
Thanks for your help.
0
Comments
-
Some one may have bought it to extend their garden or as land to keep animals on.
Only way to find out for sure, is to find out who bought it and go from there, firstly ask the vendor of the house, they may well know.Pawpurrs x
0 -
Thanks for your reply pawpurrs. Yeah, we're hoping it may be to keep horses on or something. We've called the auction place but they say they can't tell us who's bought it (it only sold last week). The vendor doesn't know anything either. I think it will be OK - just wanted to know if there's anything we should be suspicious of.0
-
Sometimes people buy land if it's cheap enough in the hope that at some time in the future the planning laws will be relaxed & building upon it may become a possibility.The bigger the bargain, the better I feel.
I should mention that there's only one of me, don't confuse me with others of the same name.0 -
Don't want to be negative but ...
We bought a house overlooking farmland. Before we bought it we checked with the LA and were told that the village boundary ran along the bottom of our garden and the farmland could never be built on.
Whilst we had the property up for sale we were invited to a meeting to discuss the siting of the new village hall. One of the proposed sites was directly behind our house. At the meeting a vote was taken and the preferred location was another option further out of the village. Our purchaser was happy (and at the meeting) and the sale completed.
After we moved one of our old neighbours got in touch to say that a planning application had been put in for the field for affordable housing, a floodlit football pitch with changing facilities and a new village hall. They wanted to know if we had any correspondence showing that we had been told that the land would not be built on. Unfortunately we did not but I advised them to look at the development plan for the LA which did show the village is unsuitable for further development because it did not have enough facilities.
The application was withdrawn as an 'invalid application' but I don't think it will be last of it as the Parish Council has been asked to identify locations for affordable housing to be built in response to a housing needs survey.
There is extreme pressure on LAs to identify where they are going to put all the new housing that the government says needs to be built. Open space can be undesignated and built upon. Where I live now there is an ongoing campaign to stop the council identifying allotments as building land.
I would check and see if the council has already allocated sites for future housing growth. A plan should be available on their website.0 -
Thank you for your responses - particularly m_13. It's very useful to know that they can change the rules. Will do a bit more digging around I think - just to be on the safe side.0
-
The only way to (almost) guarentee a view is to own all the land between your house and the view.
Ask around the village -someone will know who has bought it.0 -
Or they bought it to prevent someone else building on it in the future and spoiling their view or so as not to be overlooked.RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0 -
Richard_Webster wrote: »Or they bought it to prevent someone else building on it in the future and spoiling their view or so as not to be overlooked.
Yeah, my auntie and uncle did this. The farmer was selling his fields which were directly behind my auntie and uncle's house. Because they didn't want anyone buying it and developing the land, they bought it themselves. They have no plans to develop it but want to preserve their privacy.0 -
hi
where my sister lives in essex, the strip of land either side of her were supposidly bought by a lady to put her horses on. Overnight the caravans arrived and she now has traveller camps either side of her.
Beware. It takes forever for the council to get rid of them especially when they own the land and it is green belt.0 -
People weigh these things up all the time.
I was interested in a smallholding last year, partly because it was on the edge of a rapidly-growing village. After seeing where the development boundary was, I decided that they'd probably not be thinking to include the relevant field for a long time, so I lost interest. Others must have felt the same way, as it didn't sell for ages.
However, we could have all been wrong as, just occasionally, 'odd' decisions are made, for one reason or another.
You just have to do the research & thinking the other way round, but there's nothing sinister in itself about people buying a field at auction. A clue could be in what they paid per acre, however!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards