We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Prime BTL returns in London are now at September 2000 levels.
Comments
-
chucknorris wrote: »To anyone reading this he is lying, although I am keen to meet up face to face that was all that was said in the PM
Cos everything you've posted so far seemed rational I'm sure you were offering to meet up for a cup of tea :rolleyes:0 -
chucknorris,
I really get the impression that cleaver was just trying to be funny-it was a little funny, but probably not if you took it personally.
I'm sure your wife is the absolutely picture of purity and I'm pretty sure nothing was meant personally.
0 -
Are you serious? As an impartial observer I have to say the more angry you get the funnier it is.
I am nowhere near as angry as you think (especially after Man U's goal) But I just hate internet wimps who think they can insult people from the keyboard. Obviously he would never have the balls to meet me, I know his sort.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
You are aware that Cleaver is a guy? This is mainly a hetero sort of board, although we accept all sorts in these 'modern days'chucknorris wrote: »To anyone reading this he is lying, although I am keen to meet up face to face that was all that was said in the PM0 -
lostinrates wrote: »chucknorris,
I really get the impression that cleaver was just trying to be funny-it was a little funny, but probably not if you took it personally.
I'm sure your wife is the absolutely picture of purity and I'm pretty sure nothing was meant personally.
Thanks, but I don't think so judging from his folow up posts, but thanks for the consideration anywayChuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
chucknorris - he wasn't trying to insult you, it was a joke!0
-
chucknorris wrote: »I am nowhere near as angry as you think (especially after Man U's goal) But I just hate internet wimps who think they can insult people from the keyboard. Obviously he would never have the balls to meet me, I know his sort.
Actually, I'd not have the balls to meet you either. You do sound quite forceful. And I'm a girl and don't have balls.
Honestly, cleaver has always struck me as a nice person, and there are very few I'd say that about here. He made a poor judgement call in wit, thats all.0 -
You are aware that Cleaver is a guy? This is mainly a hetero sort of board, although we accept all sorts in these 'modern days'
Whilst the first place you might not think of putting your fist was in his face, that's certainly the only place I had in mindChuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
I'm still trying to think of something to talk about.
0 -
chucknorris wrote: »Thanks, but I don't think so judging from his folow up posts, but thanks for the consideration anyway
The regulars on this board will 100% back me up when I say that my posts were for cheap, quick laughs rather than to insult. Rather than add to economic debate, I enjoy annoying others with pointless sarcasm, and (non) witty repartee. I'm that type.
I'd be more than happy to discuss the dynamics of how internet boards work, and how you have to take certain things with pinch of salt and understand that text often comes across in a rather stark, unsubtle way as you can't convey facial expressions and in prose like you can in verbal speech. But I'd be a bit scared you'd kick my head in.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards