We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Merc v. Saab

124»

Comments

  • harveybobbles
    harveybobbles Posts: 8,973 Forumite
    The !!!!!! 1.9 can be found in Alfa's, Saab's, Fiat's and Vauxhall's is waht I was referring to.

    I beg to differ about the 16v being better than the 8v - we have less trouble with warranty work on the lower powered 8v unit.
  • vikingaero
    vikingaero Posts: 10,920 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    kitchpoo wrote: »
    Some clarification on comonality of engines....

    The 2.0 T Petrol Saab unit is unique to Saab and was a Saab development and is not the same as the 2.0 T in the Vectra platform.

    The 2.0T Vectra is hardly a common engine in the Vauxhall range. It's outnumbered by the 1.8 and 2.2 petrols.
    The 2.2 TiD is the GM Y22DTH unit and the 1.9 is the cross development from the Alfa/Fiat range, in both the 8 and 16v guise.

    The best engine is the 16v 1.9.

    Only the chassis and most auxillary engine componants (starter, alternator etc) are compatible across the Saab/GM counter.

    The 2.2TiD was Saabs stop-gap engine to provide a diesel engine for the range. The 1.9 is by now the most common engine on 9-3's and unfortunately shares the same common traits as the same engine in the Vauxhall/Opel platform - ie. tis a bucket o' crap.
    The man without a signature.
  • Hintza
    Hintza Posts: 19,420 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I though Mrecedes had learnt their lesson and have moved away from accountancy driven car manufacture and back to it's routes of engineering excellence. However I guess we wil just have to wait and see if that is the case.
  • Brooker_Dave
    Brooker_Dave Posts: 5,196 Forumite
    indend to keep car for 3 to 4 years

    Saab with depreciate down to nothing, Merc will still be worth something.

    Saab just some sort of rebadged Vauxhall, Merc proper car.

    HTH.
    "Love you Dave Brooker! x"

    "i sent a letter headded sales of god act 1979"
  • Saab with depreciate down to nothing, Merc will still be worth something.

    Saab just some sort of rebadged Vauxhall, Merc proper car.

    HTH.

    It is amazingly funny to read some of the posts on this topic.

    SAAB currently is part of the GM family, but is by no means a Vauxhall. They use the standard GM floorpan that is also used in the Vectra, but that is about where it ends.

    They are fantastically safe, reliable and brilliant to drive. GM are looking to offload SAAB, and currently have 20 bidders (try googling it)

    If you are lucky, you can find some pre reged 58 plate 93's in showrooms, with zero mileage with 9k knocked off the book price. The servicing is cheap in comparrison to Merc/BMW/Audi and drive quality alone sets them apart from the German alternative. Go test drive one, and see what I mean.
  • rattla
    rattla Posts: 475 Forumite
    Hard for people to give unbiased advise to be honest, everyone likes their own makes and neither a Saab or Merc are bad cars by any means.

    Try both and form you own opinion, that's all you can do to be honest. Any car can have issues and you always get an unlucky car here and there that seems to get a lot.

    Merc C Classes reliability and build improved substantially from late 2004 and the new C Class from 2007 is a really well respected car, that's bang up to date.

    Personally would avoid the Saab, though you are going to get more car/extras for your money.
  • zappahey
    zappahey Posts: 2,252 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It is amazingly funny to read some of the posts on this topic.

    SAAB currently is part of the GM family, but is by no means a Vauxhall. They use the standard GM floorpan that is also used in the Vectra, but that is about where it ends.

    Well, yes, apart from the shared brake, suspension and electrical components as well as a number of ancillary components.
    What goes around - comes around
  • stu20vt
    stu20vt Posts: 68 Forumite
    Saab are not going bust, there are 20 bidders and an announcement will be made in June.
    I own a 93 V6 Turbo Aero Sportwagon model and am delighted with it. Ticks all the boxes for a fast family car without the image of BMW/Audi.
    Oh and it has been the most reliable car I have ever owned, and its safe.
  • kitchpoo
    kitchpoo Posts: 1,255 Forumite
    me wrote:
    Some clarification on comonality of engines....

    The 2.0 T Petrol Saab unit is unique to Saab and was a Saab development and is not the same as the 2.0 T in the Vectra platform.
    vikingaero wrote: »
    The 2.0T Vectra is hardly a common engine in the Vauxhall range. It's outnumbered by the 1.8 and 2.2 petrols

    I didnt say it was a common engine - it was that the commonality is not the same as the Saab.
    Praying at the church of MSE should be compulsory!

    There are three types of people in the world, those who can add up and those who can't.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.