We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
It's lewis'S not lewis'
Comments
-
I appreciate threads like this, I do try and take pride in my use of the English Language. Though I am still prone to the odd typo or grammatical error it does frustrate me when some people lack basic skills:
Your and You're
License (in English it's Licence, License with an s is a verb)
There, their and they're
It's and its (it's is an abbreviation of it is. Its is possessive)
Affect and effect
The use of an apostrophe for plurals, no no no!
It would be my preference for Martin Lewis's ....... but accept either is acceptable......0 -
davetrousers wrote: »Affect and effect
Please can you explain this to me! I've read various explanation but have never been able to get my head around it.Wedding 5th September 20150 -
I know it's off topic but......I wish people would stop using " could of " when they mean " could have ". Even " could've " would be better!:eek:
Sorry for the pedantry!My favourite subliminal message is;0 -
Even worse, people who say 'pacifically' instead of 'specifically'.0
-
When I was being forced to learn the mutated language that is English (which doesn't have many words that haven't been "permanently borrowed" from other languages), I was taught that Lewis' would be correct, although Lewis's is also correct (but it looks wrong to my eyes).0
-
Ladies' changing room
Children's changing room
Lewis's Money Saving Expert0 -
Ladies' changing room
Children's changing room
Lewis's Money Saving Expert
No - you're just not getting it!
Children is a plural so the apostrophe goes before the "S".
Ladies is a plural too but already has an S so you dont need a second.
Martin Lewis is not a plural but it has an "S". So the second S is optional.
I would suggest that you get yourself a simple English GCSE workbook for 13-16 year olds with basic punctuation units in and take it from there. Then go through your CV and check for mistakes - if your understanding of basic punctuation is anything to go by, there could be many......."One day I realised that when you are lying in your grave, it's no good saying, "I was too shy, too frightened."
Because by then you've blown your chances. That's it."0 -
Is MSE full of english teachers?
0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
