Superb piece on Yahoo Money following on from -55% prediction

stevetodd

Chad_as_yer_dad wrote: »

Those graphs show current and historical trends.
Bold - I rest my case.:rotfl:

LOL are you really this stupid?

Chad_as_yer_dad

stevetodd wrote: »

Hang on a minute the only 4 posts you have ever done on this site is to me on this thread, well I wonder who you really are?

I am me.

What more do you need to know?
I'm just commenting on some of your comments which appear to 1. Make you seem more intelligent than you are and 2. Expose your knowledge or lack thereof of the housing market. Oh and 3. trying to make it sound like you are a big shot because you are apparently buying 3 houses, but double bedrooms remember, because tenants don't like singles.
Very astute of you.

Chad_as_yer_dad

stevetodd wrote: »

Well it's easily settled would you like to bet on it? The records at the RICS would quickly settle this matter, what's your real ID why are you hiding behind this sock puppet? Who are you, I think I know and I suspect others will too, what do you think dopetester (I know it's not you, but I reckon you would guess who this is?)

No not really. But thanks for the offer. Why don't you just give me 7 trillion pounds and we will call it quits.
Your posts suggest you are writing this from a school playground.
Who is dopetester by the way?
I can assure you, I have no aliases, no affiliations or pseudonyms.

stevetodd

Chad_as_yer_dad wrote: »

I am me.

What more do you need to know?
I'm just commenting on some of your comments which appear to 1. Make you seem more intelligent than you are and 2. Expose your knowledge or lack thereof of the housing market. Oh and 3. trying to make it sound like you are a big shot because you are apparently buying 3 houses, but double bedrooms remember, because tenants don't like singles.
Very astute of you.

LOL well sorry but the fact is that I don't have to resort to lies and I can quite easily prove everything that I have said

Chad_as_yer_dad

stevetodd wrote: »

LOL well sorry but the fact is that I don't have to resort to lies MrDT and I can quite easily prove everything that I have said

Please can you post facts before making assumptions. Evidence is needed to prove guilt. Ergo case before trial.

stevetodd

Chad_as_yer_dad wrote: »

Please can you post facts before making assumptions. Evidence is needed to prove guilt. Ergo case before trial.

I think I know who you are, but to be honest I feel a bit sorry for you.

Chad_as_yer_dad

stevetodd wrote: »

LOL totally busted MrDT, did you miss the appology I posted to you earlier MrDT? Look again you will find it.

You must be confused. Or deluded. Like I said before facts before you accuse me. I'm not getting into a petty argument about who you think I may or not be.
You bore me so much I might go eat my own face. Or this pompous idiot's - :money:

stevetodd

Chad_as_yer_dad wrote: »

You must be confused. Or deluded. Like I said before facts before you accuse me. I'm not getting into a petty argument about who you think I may or not be.
You bore me so much I might go eat my own face. Or this pompous idiot's - :money:

I don't think insulting Martin will win you many friends here

MrDT

stevetodd wrote: »

LOL totally busted MrDT, did you miss the appology I posted to you earlier MrDT? Look again you will find it.

Morning. I've just woken up, not been on since my last post. I'll accept your apology Steve.

For the record, I don't have any other accounts on here. I don't see the point. If I wanted to argue, I'd happily do so under this account

stevetodd

MrDT wrote: »

Morning. I've just woken up, not been on since my last post. I'll accept your apology Steve.

For the record, I don't have any other accounts on here. I don't see the point. If I wanted to argue, I'd happily do so under this account

Thanks, I received some bad news last night and should have just switched off. I wasn't in a good state of mind to go on a forum.

I only thought it was you because that jerk came on soon after you left (ie a timing thing) but soon after I realised that it was NOT you. I could tell that he is much less intelligent and civilised than you. To date that ID has only posted 10 posts all to me last night. I have both edited and deleted my posts that refer to you. There were 2 clues to his real ID:

He obviously has very low esteem (as he made a big point about me saying that I was a surveyor, when in reality there is no big deal about it, except to him). In fact about 90% of the surveyors I know would rather do something else (some already have).

He referred to and posted a graph from that housepricecrash website and a quick look at your previous posts shows that you haven't mentioned that website.

I think I know who it is, but as I was out of order too (with you) there isn't any point in chasing it and in any case I am now chilled out. I actually feel a bit sorry for him.

Thanks for graciously accepting my appology.