Afprb 2009

gt568

frugal_matelot wrote: »

You could well be right gt568 - apologies.

The air force doesn't make mistakes old bean:rotfl: ...:D

frugal_matelot

lennymfo wrote: »

Alright ship mate, you are not a Wtr giving our gash advice are you

No I'm not a Wtr and its only gash advice if you're not foreign!! It doesn't mean they won't raise the entitled rates by the same amount though. Wtr indeed! and I have not given any gash any advice.

System

frugal_matelot wrote: »

No I'm not a Wtr and its only gash advice if you're not foreign!! It doesn't mean they won't raise the entitled rates by the same amount though. Wtr indeed! and I have not given any gash any advice.

Sorry mate was only kidding I too would be offended if someone called me Wtr or is it Log(Pers) now. Stupid stupid name.

frugal_matelot

Log is better. They do seem to be rather inanimate especially when it comes to giving advice (it is their money after all).

System

frugal_matelot wrote: »

Log is better. They do seem to be rather inanimate especially when it comes to giving advice (it is their money after all).

I agree that the new generation of Wtrs seem to be more reactive than proactive. I wonder if this is JPA related???

frugal_matelot

The ones in my UPO don't use the JSP's for pay and allowances. The have an in office discussion and decide that way whether you are entitled or not. I kid you not. This has happened to me twice in the last 2 months and both times when I've told them to check the publications, blow me, I'm only entitled to it!! Sadly its better to print out the relevant pages and take them with you, it saves them having to look on the intranet.

Thats it UPO rant over - off topic

frugal_matelot

See this

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmagenda/ob90331.htm

Tuesday 31st March 2009

Written Ministerial Statements to be made today

9 Secretary of State for Defence: Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body—Response to recommendations.


Looks like we will find out something today

System

frugal_matelot wrote: »

See this

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmagenda/ob90331.htm

Tuesday 31st March 2009

Written Ministerial Statements to be made today

9 Secretary of State for Defence: Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body—Response to recommendations.


Looks like we will find out something today

Good and with plenty of time to make the changes on JPA. I wouldnt like to be the victim of a 'mass rush job' would you?

Trying_to_be_good

frugal_matelot wrote: »

See this

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmagenda/ob90331.htm

Tuesday 31st March 2009

Written Ministerial Statements to be made today

9 Secretary of State for Defence: Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body—Response to recommendations.


Looks like we will find out something today

Good spot - also doctors, dentists, teachers, Senior Salaires Review Body, and something on Parliamentary Pensions (guess where the media might focus)...

thesmiddy

It's out, but embargoed until 1200. I'm sure details will appear here in due course. At least killick writers will now get paid what we deserve!