We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

2004...My Ar*e....Make Your Predictions...

167891012»

Comments

  • mbga9pgf
    mbga9pgf Posts: 3,224 Forumite
    Easiest way, target above RPI increases in capital in our homes. My way:

    3.5X multiple max regulated by FSA
    No self Cert (liar loans) proof of income a must
    minimum 10% deposit

    The best bit (Gordy would love this) All capital gains on houses from purchase date above RPIX to be taxed at 90%. Second homes, same, except rate 95%. Increase above this allowed upon production of reciepts for work done to home, however, there reciepts are adjusted by 10% every year for effects of wear and tear. Extentions etc can be added on, again however, not above the level that was paid to the builder and shown on their vat reciepts. Abolish stamp duty. That is the only way I can see of politically stabilizing prices. As for the economy at large, increase the remit of the FSA, make it completely independent of the Government, funded using cash generated by the BOE, again, set budgets and no rises above RPI. BOE appointments made by politically neutral FSA. FSA has powers to charge individuals with corporate fraud and has complete oversight of the market. Only people able to interfere with the FSA would be the courts who would deal with appeals.
  • Kenny4315
    Kenny4315 Posts: 1,133 Forumite
    mbga9pgf wrote: »

    The best bit (Gordy would love this) All capital gains on houses from purchase date above RPIX to be taxed at 90%. Second homes, same, except rate 95%.

    That would really help the market....

    It would mean that movement up the ladder would be effectively stopped, as all the equity in your property would be taxed, result no deposit once selling/moving costs are taken into account. It would really encourage people work hard to better themselves. I believe in a LOW TAX policy, not all my hard earned paying for CHAV's and incompetent governments. I also believe now I am older and wiser that 'socialism' does not work, I feel the best system is for people to pay for what they consume, rather than paying for what others waste.

    If the TAX regime you propose happened the countries wealth would simply up-sticks and move prior to the law being made.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.