We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Diskeeper 10 (Defragmentation software)

Hey guys, new computer on the way (fixed hopefully) :)
Is it true you should defragment as soon as you get your pc? And is it best not to rely on Windows own Defrag tool?

Anyway, I'm not sure which Diskeeper to get, Amazon list billions of them: Diskeeper 2008, Pro, Proffessional, Diskeeper 10, 7, 8 etc..and I can't find a normal 'home-1 user version'. So do any of you guys/gals use it?

Cheers :)
Sealed Pot Challenge 15  #78

 Debt Free: July 2022.
«13

Comments

  • John_Gray
    John_Gray Posts: 5,847 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Occasional defragmentation is useful to reduce the time taken for the disk heads to read all of the file you want. Obsessive defragmentation is, in my view, rather a waste of time.

    I use the built-in Windows XP defragmenter, either the GUI or the command-line method. It's free; some of the others are also free (e.g. Defraggler, Ultra Defrag, JKDefrag).
  • You shouldn't need to defragment a new computer. File systems such as NTFS are designed to decrease the likelihood of fragmentation. Modern systems also profit enormously from the huge disk capacities currently available, since partially filled disks fragment much less than full disks.
    Windows Defrag, (which I believe is based on Diskeeper) will do the job, although programs such as 'official' Diskeeper may do more quickly and efficiently. Google for Diskeeper to find which is the latest version.
  • aliEnRIK
    aliEnRIK Posts: 17,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Defraggler is the best ive used so far
    http://www.defraggler.com/
    certainly better than the inbuilt windows one, and the other 3 ive tried
    :idea:
  • Conor_3
    Conor_3 Posts: 6,944 Forumite
    You shouldn't need to defragment a new computer. File systems such as NTFS are designed to decrease the likelihood of fragmentation..

    Rubbish. You should see the computer I had to sort out a week last Sunday.
  • Conor_3
    Conor_3 Posts: 6,944 Forumite
    rancid-a wrote: »
    Hey guys, new computer on the way (fixed hopefully) :)
    Is it true you should defragment as soon as you get your pc? And is it best not to rely on Windows own Defrag tool?

    Anyway, I'm not sure which Diskeeper to get, Amazon list billions of them: Diskeeper 2008, Pro, Proffessional, Diskeeper 10, 7, 8 etc..and I can't find a normal 'home-1 user version'. So do any of you guys/gals use it?

    Cheers :)

    Diskeeper 2008 is the current version. Depending on what OS you use determines whether you need the plain vanilla or Pro.

    I have been using Diskeeper for about 4 years now. Saying that though, recently I tried IOBits Smartdefrag 1.02 which is FREE. After a few weeks of heavy usage, I popped Diskeeper back on and there was next to no fragmentation so IOBits was definitely doing a good job.

    My advice? Download and install IOBits Smartdefrag 1.02. Set it to start automatically and defrag as and when it needs to.

    I won't be paying for Diskeeper again in the light of the above and Smartdefrag is now on my list of "software to put on every new Windows installation."
  • loaner wrote: »
    Vista defrags itself, buying or installing 3rd party software to do the same job would be a waste of money. You are unlikely to notice any difference after a defrag, whatever defragger you use, it is a waste of time on most systems

    Totaly agree ...it uses VSS , runs in low priority ,can be scheduled and you don`t even notice it running.
    Always follow the path of least resistance.
  • savemoney
    savemoney Posts: 18,125 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    I use O&O defrag 11 sits in taskbar and runs without any intervention. Also they do a 64bit version which is what I am using in Vista Sp 1 64bit
  • Conor_3
    Conor_3 Posts: 6,944 Forumite
    loaner wrote: »
    You are unlikely to notice any difference after a defrag, whatever defragger you use, it is a waste of time on most systems

    Sorry but the thick end of two decades of experience tells me different.
  • isofa
    isofa Posts: 6,091 Forumite
    Conor wrote: »
    Sorry but the thick end of two decades of experience tells me different.

    Agree with Conor, been using systems with Hard Discs since the late 1980s (lovely Mac SEs!). NTFS gets very fragmented.

    A defrag on a heavily used system can make a world of difference.

    I usually use Diskeeper, but may give the others mentioned a whirl next time.

    Understanding the difference between continuous and contiguous blocks of data also helps ;)
  • Jake'sGran
    Jake'sGran Posts: 3,269 Forumite
    savemoney wrote: »
    I use O&O defrag 11 sits in taskbar and runs without any intervention. Also they do a 64bit version which is what I am using in Vista Sp 1 64bit

    Didn't someone say that Vista does it's own defrag? As my new laptop when I get it will have Vista someone please say who is right! Also, I don't need anymore shoes
    and who is DM?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.