We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Dow

1101113151634

Comments

  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    StevieJ wrote: »
    Don't forget the dividends :beer: The point being even after a disastrous run it will not be far off outperforming cash.

    Really? Any idea what average dividend yield on the FTSE 100 has been since 1996? Given the tech bubble (those companies weren't paying dividends and they ruined the dividend paying potential of insurance companies for a year or two) and the collapse in bank dividends more recently I would guesstimate it at about 2% or thereabouts. Long term average is 3.5% from memory.

    Dividends are (or should be) an important part of returns from stock market investments I agree.
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Generali wrote: »
    Really? Any idea what average dividend yield on the FTSE 100 has been since 1996? Given the tech bubble (those companies weren't paying dividends and they ruined the dividend paying potential of insurance companies for a year or two) and the collapse in bank dividends more recently I would guesstimate it at about 2% or thereabouts. Long term average is 3.5% from memory.

    Dividends are (or should be) an important part of returns from stock market investments I agree.
    For a rough idea
    Dividends to 2005
    http://www.fool.co.uk/news/Comment/2005/c051220e.htm
    Today 5.58%
    1yr ago 3.88%
    2yr ago 3.03%

    So roughly 3 to 3.5% tax free to a basic rate taxpayer.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • 5.58% today but no one seems to believe that will stick or they'd invest


    2-Yr Benchmark Govt Yields - Germany vs Other Nations

    Current
    Spread in Basis Points
    Yield Today Prev Day Week Ago Month Ago Year Ago

    Germany 1.445 %
    Australia 2.745 % 130.0 132.0 164.4 140.4 311.0
    Austria 1.242 % -20.3 -9.6 1.9 -5.2 22.4
    Belgium 1.225 % -22.0 -17.0 1.0 -3.9 28.7
    Canada 0.996 % -44.9 -46.9 -26.4 -46.6 -58.6
    Denmark 2.169 % 72.4 72.6 84.3 106.7 55.5
    France 1.688 % 24.3 24.1 26.9 10.3 20.7
    Italy 2.163 % 71.8 71.8 83.0 76.9 59.5
    Japan 0.415 % -103.0 -103.5 -78.6 -100.0 -261.6
    Netherlands 1.674 % 22.9 23.8 35.1 28.9 21.9
    Portugal 2.360 % 91.5 103.7 112.3 40.5 43.0
    Spain 1.997 % 55.2 49.3 77.7 79.7 25.9
    Sweden
    U.K. 1.368 % -7.7 -7.5 -6.0 22.4 76.9
    U.S. 1.000 % -44.5 -42.9 -29.2 -42.5 -155.9
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    StevieJ wrote: »
    For a rough idea
    Dividends to 2005
    http://www.fool.co.uk/news/Comment/2005/c051220e.htm
    Today 5.58%
    1yr ago 3.88%
    2yr ago 3.03%

    So roughly 3 to 3.5% tax free to a basic rate taxpayer.

    Interesting, I'm surprised it's as high as that.

    Anyone with access to a Bloomberg terminal who can give us an idea going further back?
  • 24q464x.jpg

    2wn058n.jpg

    in5ncy.jpg
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    24q464x.jpg

    2wn058n.jpg

    in5ncy.jpg

    So in the US at least, dividend returns have been lower than the long-term average for the past ten or so years.
  • Yea which I think supports the whole overvalued market adjustment we're seeing

    I might have got the graphs from this site:
    http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article8065.html

    Stock Market Investment Screening for Top Yielding Dividend Stocks



  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    5.58% today but no one seems to believe that will stick or they'd invest

    I should imagine you could put together a fairly defensive high yield portfolio.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    StevieJ wrote: »
    I should imagine you could put together a fairly defensive high yield portfolio.

    You can easily find stocks yielding 5-6% which are massively defensive.

    I mean why the hell is the National Grid paying 6% dividend? From the FT website:
    National Grid has a Debt to Total Capital ratio of 4.69%, little changed from the previous year's 0.01%.

    So no debt problems then.
    In 2008, cash reserves at National Grid fell by 1.42bn. However, the company earned 3.19bn from its operations for a Cash Flow Margin of 27.73%. In addition the company used 3.02bn on investing activities and also paid 1.59bn in financing cash flows.

    Ok, so cash balances fell. Looks like it was to finance investment rather than going to the markets. Sensible in the current climate.
    Year on year National Grid grew net income 129.27% from 1.39bn to 3.20bn primarily through revenue growth (8.78bn to 11.50bn). For while the costs associated with cost of goods, selling, general and administrative and debt all increased as a percentage of sales, the 30.99% growth in revenues contributed enough to still see net income improve.

    Revenues and average costs moving in the right (opposite) directions.

    I'm a bit out of touch, clearly. I guess it's just that foreigners don't want to be in the UK right now - this is a function of that trillion quid that has been withdrawn from the UK. The yield is good in sterling terms but if the pound drops by 10% this year, your dividend is wiped out in capital losses.
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Dolly Day for the Dow :j
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.