📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bank paying-in receipt worthless?

2

Comments

  • No wonder the banks have such a bad name!

    The whole point of standing there while the money is counted is for both parties to AGREE the amount. The stamp confirms this.

    A cheque is totally different. They are simply confirming that they have the cheque, not that it is worth anything - hence the clearing time.

    Even if they were £100 short at the end of the day (and totally honest) how do they know it is your £100 and not somebody else's?

    I cannot see a County Court Judge or even the FOS letting them get away with this. The press would love it!

    Keep at them!
  • opinions4u
    opinions4u Posts: 19,411 Forumite
    Keep pursuing it (if you know the figure on the receipt to be true).

    Through their complaints department.

    If this doesn't work get a letter of deadlock and take it to the Ombudsman.

    You could ultimately involve the police and make an allegation of theft. The account has been debited with £100 without consent. You have proof of the amount paid in.

    If the bank is prepared to change accounts in this way after issuing a receipt, they are effectively saying to cashiers "pocket £100 whenever you like, and we'll just take it out of the customer's account". Different for a cheque, where the cheque itself will confirm the transaction.

    Shocking!
  • chuckley
    chuckley Posts: 4,405 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    my mum paid in cash there for a bill which 'didnt arrive at the company'.

    strange how natwest are 'losing' money, when they have given out receipts.

    anyway back to the point OP u have a receipt... i dont see how they can get out of it... they are clearly trying their luck at robbing u.
  • Incisor
    Incisor Posts: 2,271 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    damienuk, does the receipt indicate the money went into your bank account?

    If it doesn't, then your friend could pay £621.50 into your account and £21.50 into one of his own, then amend his slip to £721.50, before giving it to you. Just another possibility.
    After the uprising of the 17th June The Secretary of the Writers Union
    Had leaflets distributed in the Stalinallee Stating that the people
    Had forfeited the confidence of the government And could win it back only
    By redoubled efforts. Would it not be easier In that case for the government
    To dissolve the people
    And elect another?
  • damienuk
    damienuk Posts: 31 Forumite
    Incisor wrote: »
    damienuk, does the receipt indicate the money went into your bank account?
    Yes, it did - and also my bank statement showed the full £721.50 entering my account where it sat for about 15 hours or so. On the following day there was an entry which showed up as a withdrawal of £100 from my account at the branch in question.

    I.e. when I phoned up to ask what that was all about after noticing it on my statement, they initially told me that I'd gone into the branch and withdrew £100. Excellent service!
    Incisor wrote: »
    If it doesn't, then your friend could pay £621.50 into your account and £21.50 into one of his own, then amend his slip to £721.50, before giving it to you. Just another possibility.
    I assume that you meant £100 re. paying into his own(?), but regardless he doesn't have a Natwest account anymore, and the above seems to negate that anyway.

    Anyway... I really came back to this thread to give people an update:
    I eventually gave up arguing with the branch (who said they tried to count via CCTV but couldn't; useful!?), and instead submitted a complaint with details of the incident.

    They took quite a long time to respond (although it was over Christmas too, so some grace for that point), but eventually have written to me to say that although they're definitely right they'll give me £100 + £25 compensation anyway.

    AKA It'd cost them more for Ombudsman complaint + potential for them to lose it as well.
  • Good to hear you got this resolved. It's pretty ridiculous to think they behaved the way their did in the first place!
  • vet8
    vet8 Posts: 877 Forumite
    NatWest are very hard up, they are part of RBS and clearly desperate for money any way they can get it!!
  • vet8 wrote: »
    NatWest are very hard up, they are part of RBS and clearly desperate for money any way they can get it!!

    I really doubt any company would stoop to petty theft just because it was in dire straits.

    (Countdown to various incorrect interpretations of "petty theft" - 3... 2... 1...)
  • Kavanne
    Kavanne Posts: 5,093 Forumite
    vet8 wrote: »
    NatWest are very hard up, they are part of RBS and clearly desperate for money any way they can get it!!
    Clearly you have an intimate knowledge of the bank industry!!
    Kavanne
    Nuns! Nuns! Reverse!

    'I do my job, do you do yours?'

  • Extant
    Extant Posts: 2,140 Forumite
    (Countdown to various incorrect interpretations of "petty theft" - 3... 2... 1...)

    rar rar rar taxpayers rar rar bailout rar rar UK debt levels rar Gordon Clown rar rar rar
    What would William Shatner do?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.