We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Boots charging you to pay them

Today I went into Boots and bought some make up. After I had paid with my debit card I saw a very small notice. It said that Boots charge customers 2.75% to pay by card. I asked if they would take a cheque instead but was told they do not take cheques.

Do you know of any other shops that do this?
Be nice to people who are on their way down
You never know when they are going to pass you on their way back up again
You cannot light your own candle by blowing out someone else's
«1345

Comments

  • hjb123
    hjb123 Posts: 32,002 Forumite
    it doesnt cost you any extra, that fee is included in the total amount, and it what boots pay the merchant for you paying by card
    Weight Loss - 102lb
  • DaisyFlower
    DaisyFlower Posts: 2,677 Forumite
    Boots aren't charging you extra, add up your bill and it will come to the exact amount.

    All they are showing is that 2.5% of the total goes to the card company for processing the payment - most shops just dont show this on the receipt.
  • uktim29
    uktim29 Posts: 2,722 Forumite
    Do you know of any other shops that do this?

    Every single one of them!

    And no, if you actually read the notice it will tell you the total amount you pay is unchanged. You do not pay any extra!!!! If you read it properly it tells you that.
  • hi, its a [STRIKE]vat fiddle[/STRIKE] loophole that several large retailers use, as card processing fees are not liable for VAT(I might not have the correct term there), so they can effectively only pay vat on a smaller amount of every sale, Tesco & Asda were in court about this, against the vat man, who said "its a fiddle" they said "oh no, not us", I am not sure if the case has concluded / what the latest is
  • uktim29
    uktim29 Posts: 2,722 Forumite
    Yeah but it means they are only paying VAT on the money they actually got anyway. Hardly a fiddle.
  • kr15snw
    kr15snw Posts: 2,264 Forumite
    From what I remember when I used to work in retail...

    Say a product is £10.

    If you paid by card we would have to pay £0.27 to the card company (or whoever) as a processing fee.

    If you paid by cash we would have to pay nothing!

    But we didnt charge the customers as most big companies can afford to pay these charges. Were I work now is a much smaller company and we charge 1.6% if you pay by credit card as we cant afford to pay the fees.
    Green and White Barmy Army!
  • uktim29 wrote: »
    Every single one of them!

    And no, if you actually read the notice it will tell you the total amount you pay is unchanged. You do not pay any extra!!!! If you read it properly it tells you that.

    I did read it properly. It tells me I pay 2.75% for using my card. The fact that this is included in the total is irrelevant.

    Do I get a 2.75% discount for paying cash? If not, I will be paying for a service I do not receive.
    Be nice to people who are on their way down
    You never know when they are going to pass you on their way back up again
    You cannot light your own candle by blowing out someone else's
  • stugib
    stugib Posts: 2,601 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I did read it properly. It tells me I pay 2.75% for using my card. The fact that this is included in the total is irrelevant.

    Do I get a 2.75% discount for paying cash? If not, I will be paying for a service I do not receive.

    Boots' business costs are nothing to do with you, it's between them and their card merchant. They wanted £x for the product, you were happy to pay them £x. Method of payment, and the costs each method incurs on them is irrelevant. They're not providing you with any less or more of a service when you pay by card.
  • stugib wrote: »
    Boots' business costs are nothing to do with you, it's between them and their card merchant. They wanted £x for the product, you were happy to pay them £x. Method of payment, and the costs each method incurs on them is irrelevant. They're not providing you with any less or more of a service when you pay by card.

    I don't need a lecture from you, thank you. I did my MBA some years ago. If you can't understand what I am saying, I suggest you refrain from comment.
    Be nice to people who are on their way down
    You never know when they are going to pass you on their way back up again
    You cannot light your own candle by blowing out someone else's
  • stugib
    stugib Posts: 2,601 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I don't need a lecture from you, thank you. I did my MBA some years ago. If you can't understand what I am saying, I suggest you refrain from comment.


    Go on then educate us thickies oh wise one.
    • If you pay by cash you pay £10, all to Boots. Boots pay the Treasury £1.49. You get your product for the price they offered it for.
    • If you pay by card you pay £9.72 to Boots, 28p to a Boots subsidiary. Boots pay the Treasury £1.45. You get your product for the price they offered it for. You're paying Boots' card charges, which you can think of as paying for the service of being able to pay by card if you like.
    So if you pay by cash, what service are you paying for that you're not receiving? The price is £10, not £9.72. They're being up front that if you want to buy a product by card they'll only charge you 97.25% for the product, but 2.75% to cover the card charge. If you don't want to pay their costs, then pay by cash or don't buy. The only loser I can see is the Treasury. The worst you can say is that they're not offering you a 'discount' because you pay by cash.

    HMRC took Debenhams to Court over this in 2003 but Debenhams won an appeal a couple of years later.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.