📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Quick Benefits Check

Options
MSE_Martin
MSE_Martin Posts: 8,272 Money Saving Expert
Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
Many people in the UK aren't aware of what benefits they're entitled to. A great little free site allows a quick check of what you're entitled to, for both under and over 60s.

Simply fill in the brief questionaire and it will tell you what you can do.

Lots, lots, lots more info:

After a quick entitledto check (and remember it is a quick check only), there are lots more routes to try. Thankfully the regular users of this board (benefits, tax credits and jobseeking) have created a huge resource of information, which the board guides have superbly structured.

Check out the following Benefits and Tax Credits FAQ which is full of regularly asked questions from benefits on separation to how sick pay works, and useful links to a vast range of other info sources.

Those people who are fully reliant on benefits and struggling for cash should go to an independent advice centre or Citizens advice bureau to arrange for a one-on-one benefits helps.

Make sure pensioners you know claim pensioners' credit

Rather disturbingly this weekend there was a note that 1.6 million pensions haven't claimed the pensioners' credit they're entitled to. Of course pensioners reading this should be sorted, but there are many others out there. If you know a pensioner it may be worth asking them if they've checked out all the benefits. You could simply check with the above calculator.

Martin
Martin Lewis, Money Saving Expert.
Please note, answers don't constitute financial advice, it is based on generalised journalistic research. Always ensure any decision is made with regards to your own individual circumstance.
Don't miss out on urgent MoneySaving, get my weekly e-mail at www.moneysavingexpert.com/tips.
Debt-Free Wannabee Official Nerd Club: (Honorary) Members number 000
«13456

Comments

  • Fran
    Fran Posts: 11,280 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    When using a quick checker such as "entitled to" you should always check your result with Citizens Advice Bureau or other welfare benefits advisors. There may be other facts that aren't accounted for on the calculator or there may be...:eek: ....user error! :)
    Torgwen.......... :) ...........
  • scatz
    scatz Posts: 393 Forumite
    Thank you. This entitlment calculator was pretty much correct to a £1 or so when I input my information.

    Definately one of the best I have come across.

    :beer:
    Halifax Personal Loan £23,000 :think:
  • kitaj
    kitaj Posts: 67 Forumite
    When checking on your benefit entitlement be aware that if you are a parent who lives apart from your child but have any level of shared care (up to 50%) you still can't claim any benefits for your children, even if you have to maintain them while they are with you and you pay the other parent maintenance payments. The only way you can claim anything for your children is if you hold the child benefit book, otherwise you depend on an amicable arrangement for getting any benefit from the other parent.

    This mantra is spouted by every department (Benefits Agency, DWP etc,IR) who are under the impression that parents that have separated from each other are somehow capable. in every case, of sorting out their money issues amicably. Given that huge number of divorces are the result of money differences this seems hardly likely. Apparently in this age of computers the agencies 'can't split benefits between parents'.

    When I suggested that inevitably the Child Benefit book would automatically be given to the mother in 50/50 cases or less the IR told me that was 'simply not the case' and that they would look at every case on its 'merits'; however, they were loath to let me know what these 'merits' would be.

    So. when the calculator/form asks you if you have dependant children, it assumes that you have either 100% care for your children or none at all. If you answer 'yes' to that question when you actually only have 50% care (or less) then you will get an incorrect response and when you actually apply for the benefit you'll find out that you are not really considered a parent unless you have a child benefit book to prove it. Yes this is in 2005....

    Bitter, moi?
  • Fran
    Fran Posts: 11,280 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    kitaj,

    I know exactly what you mean in your post, it is totally unfair, even when it's 50/50 care. It's a case of who is crafty enough to get the Child Benefit first because Ch. Ben. don't like to alter things once it's established. As Child Benefit is a "passport benefit" to Income Support, Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit which are income related, it means that in a situation where both are unemployed or on a low wage, one will receive all the benefits and the other will receive none towards the child, even though they might have the expense of maintaining a larger house, larger bills and paying for food etc. when the child is staying with them. There's also the way it makes the parent who can't receive these benefits feel inferior as they simply can't afford to buy clothes, presents, treats or pay for school trips and transport for their children that the other parent is more in a position to do. They are also made to feel a sub-person by having to fill in these forms as though they haven't got any children and are treated like a single person.

    Child Benefit along with the unfair Non Dependant Deduction are two of the worst aspects of the benefits system.
    Torgwen.......... :) ...........
  • Trigger_2
    Trigger_2 Posts: 14 Forumite
    For those of you that are self employed, the Inland Revenue office will require a profit or loss figure and not your income from the business to work out your Tax Credits.
  • kitaj wrote:
    When checking on your benefit entitlement be aware that if you are a parent who lives apart from your child but have any level of shared care (up to 50%) you still can't claim any benefits for your children, even if you have to maintain them while they are with you and you pay the other parent maintenance payments. The only way you can claim anything for your children is if you hold the child benefit book, otherwise you depend on an amicable arrangement for getting any benefit from the other parent.

    This mantra is spouted by every department (Benefits Agency, DWP etc,IR) who are under the impression that parents that have separated from each other are somehow capable. in every case, of sorting out their money issues amicably. Given that huge number of divorces are the result of money differences this seems hardly likely. Apparently in this age of computers the agencies 'can't split benefits between parents'.

    When I suggested that inevitably the Child Benefit book would automatically be given to the mother in 50/50 cases or less the IR told me that was 'simply not the case' and that they would look at every case on its 'merits'; however, they were loath to let me know what these 'merits' would be.

    So. when the calculator/form asks you if you have dependant children, it assumes that you have either 100% care for your children or none at all. If you answer 'yes' to that question when you actually only have 50% care (or less) then you will get an incorrect response and when you actually apply for the benefit you'll find out that you are not really considered a parent unless you have a child benefit book to prove it. Yes this is in 2005....

    Bitter, moi?
    Sorry to be pedantic, but isn't it 2006?
  • caforty
    caforty Posts: 12 Forumite
    Please be careful with your facts! You've no doubt got a really good point here but you spoil it with what is just your opinion and is not accurate - most noteably that Child Ben is a passport benefit. It isn't anything of the sort and it is taken into account as income when calculating the benefits you name.


    QUOTE=Fran]kitaj,

    I know exactly what you mean in your post, it is totally unfair, even when it's 50/50 care. It's a case of who is crafty enough to get the Child Benefit first because Ch. Ben. don't like to alter things once it's established. As Child Benefit is a "passport benefit" to Income Support, Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit which are income related, it means that in a situation where both are unemployed or on a low wage, one will receive all the benefits and the other will receive none towards the child, even though they might have the expense of maintaining a larger house, larger bills and paying for food etc. when the child is staying with them. There's also the way it makes the parent who can't receive these benefits feel inferior as they simply can't afford to buy clothes, presents, treats or pay for school trips and transport for their children that the other parent is more in a position to do. They are also made to feel a sub-person by having to fill in these forms as though they haven't got any children and are treated like a single person.

    Child Benefit along with the unfair Non Dependant Deduction are two of the worst aspects of the benefits system.[/QUOTE]
  • Caforty, I think the previous correspondents are correct about child benefit. It is a passport to others.
    I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who has fallen into this trap.
    It may be of interest for people to know that my ex-husband and I share the care of the children 50/50 (I'm now thinking this is not so rare?) and having two children we have one child benefit each. I realise we are fortunate with having an even number and obviously one of the "passports" will leave home before the other. Seems like this is a big issue and I'd like to see more discussion about it. Cheers, Caroline

    caforty wrote:
    Please be careful with your facts! You've no doubt got a really good point here but you spoil it with what is just your opinion and is not accurate - most noteably that Child Ben is a passport benefit. It isn't anything of the sort and it is taken into account as income when calculating the benefits you name.


    QUOTE=Fran]kitaj,

    I know exactly what you mean in your post, it is totally unfair, even when it's 50/50 care. It's a case of who is crafty enough to get the Child Benefit first because Ch. Ben. don't like to alter things once it's established. As Child Benefit is a "passport benefit" to Income Support, Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit which are income related, it means that in a situation where both are unemployed or on a low wage, one will receive all the benefits and the other will receive none towards the child, even though they might have the expense of maintaining a larger house, larger bills and paying for food etc. when the child is staying with them. There's also the way it makes the parent who can't receive these benefits feel inferior as they simply can't afford to buy clothes, presents, treats or pay for school trips and transport for their children that the other parent is more in a position to do. They are also made to feel a sub-person by having to fill in these forms as though they haven't got any children and are treated like a single person.

    Child Benefit along with the unfair Non Dependant Deduction are two of the worst aspects of the benefits system.
    [/QUOTE]
  • Fran
    Fran Posts: 11,280 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    caforty wrote:
    Please be careful with your facts! You've no doubt got a really good point here but you spoil it with what is just your opinion and is not accurate - most noteably that Child Ben is a passport benefit. It isn't anything of the sort and it is taken into account as income when calculating the benefits you name.


    Hi,

    Yes Child Benefit is taken into account as income, but for example if two parents both unemployed or low waged with 50/50 care apply for all the benefits only one can get it. One would have eg. Child Benefit and would get any Child Tax Credit and be able to be on Income Support without having to sign on and be able to earn £20 per week without it affecting their benefits. The other would have to sign on (if unemployed) as a single person and be able to earn £5 before it affects their benefits.

    If they both start work of 16 hours, the person with the child could get a lone parent element and help towards child care. The person without child benefit would have to be working 30 hours to qualify for any WTC at all.

    Using "entitled to" calculator and putting in one child, working earning £10,000, and no disabilities etc., the parent with the child would get £2,314.10 Child Tax Credits and £3,621.95 Working Tax Credit, a total of £5,936.05
    . Using the same info but without being able to put the child in, the person is entitled to £0.00 WTC/CTC.

    The person with WTC/CTC would also be entitled to help through the NHS low income scheme (free prescriptions, dental checks, glasses vouchers etc.) and free school meals, which the other working parent would not.
    Torgwen.......... :) ...........
  • MJay
    MJay Posts: 148 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Hi, I read about the dilemmas and injustice when shared care of children is not recognised and wanted to add another lousy practice.

    After 30 years, I have been 'penshioned off' from public sector work because of ill health. My pension is good (no complaints) but I have a mortgage until I am 77...... Gulp!!

    Because of my lump some (much of which has gone off mortgage/ sorting credit cards/ replacing a VERY old banger etc) I am not entitled to Income Support but only have @ £250 per month to live on and run my (desperately needed) car.

    I have three permanent disabilities - one of which is degenerative but was turned down for DLA last year. I expected to be entitled to Incapacity Benefit and indeed I am.....

    However, despite many well published statements that the benefit is NOT means tested, ALL pensions from employers are taken into consideration. I am over the limit and only get a credit for my National Insurance contribution (worth approximately £2.15 per week)........

    I had no choice but to pay into a pension and I am now deeply grateful that I did but it seems a grave injustice that my enforced thrift has cut me out of a much needed state award.

    I am old enough to know that life isn't fair but neverthe less would dearly like to have a temper tantrum and shout "That's not fair" at some politician!!!

    MJay
    :rotfl: Older and growing
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.