We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
UKPC Leaving site NTK - Unsure of appeal position
Comments
-
One other issue to explore - often car park planning permission includes the caveat that the car park is also available for use when visiting other parts of the town. Worth a call to the LA planning department to check whether any such caveat applied to this particular car park.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
Could this be the next generation of the UKPC scam ???
If you saw these clips on the UKPC web site and then
they vanished, then you need to request UKPC for
all information they hold about the incident.
If UKPC refuse or ignore you, then you issue a complaint
to the ICO and copy in the BPA and the DVLA
Next step is to contact the retailer who could well be subject
to a data breach
Who is the retailer ?0 -
Does the site have notices advising of ANPR or other cameras monitoring? And get some evidence that disputes where one parking area begins and the other ends.0
-
Carphone Warehouse. Appeal submitted yesterday, will keep you informed (it says within 35 days). I will check the LA regarding usage, and also visit the CW store to establish the signage re 1) ANPR and 2) who owns the camera that filmed the driver (and other individuals in the area at the time) that was on the website.
I amended the appeals template to add the request for any CCTV/Video/Images UKPC hold. Really appreciate all the support too.0 -
Ignore a letter or email begging to know who was driving. Sit tight & wait for the POPLA code.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Received a letter today, assumed it was the POPLA code. However, it appears to have been cancelled, on the basis of a slightly modified template appeal on the MSE site.
So worry over, and strangely they must have some concern over the enforceability of this. I did request copies of the video and photographs which may have been a factor.
So a big thank you again to the experts here, fantastic help, and... a result!
G0 -
Good result. :T
Did you realise that UKPC are in much trouble with the DVLA - currently banned from access. While no one is sure the precise reason, I've read one suggestion that it might be over some CCTV App they were using to film site leavers.
Might fit in with them hastily cancelling your ticket.
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2018/04/ukpc-banned-by-dvla.htmlon the basis of a slightly modified template appeal on the MSE sitePlease note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
I am the keeper of the vehicle which you claim, received this purported 'parking charge'. There will be no admissions as to who was driving and no assumptions can be drawn. I am not liable and I believe that your signs fail the test of 'large lettering' and prominence, as established in!ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis.!Your unremarkable and obscure signs are in small print and the [STRIKE]onerous [/STRIKE]terms are not readable.
Should you fail to cancel this PCN immediately, I require the following information with your template rejection:
1. Does your charge represent damages for breach of contract? Answer yes or no.
2. Please provide dated photos of the signs that you say were on site, which you contend formed a contract.
3. Please provide!all!photographs / images / videos taken of this vehicle.
I am alarmed by your contact and I do not give you consent to process any data relating to me, or this vehicle. I deny liability and will not respond to debt collectors. You must consider this letter a Section 10 Notice under the DPA, and should you fail to respond accordingly, your company will be reported to the Information Commissioner.
I have kept proof of submission of this appeal and will also be making a formal complaint to your client landowner.
If you are a current BPA member, send me a POPLA code. If you are an IPC firm, cease and desist with all contact.
Yours faithfully,0 -
Is this Milton Keynes by any chance?Always remember to abide by Space Corps Directive 39436175880932/B:
'All nations attending the conference are only allocated one parking space.'0 -
Received a letter today, assumed it was the POPLA code. However, it appears to have been cancelled, on the basis of a slightly modified template appeal on the MSE site.
So worry over, and strangely they must have some concern over the enforceability of this. I did request copies of the video and photographs which may have been a factor.
So a big thank you again to the experts here, fantastic help, and... a result!
G
WELL DONE :beer:
What can we say about UKPC ...
Hapless ex clamper retards and now on their second
DVLA ban, we do not see the BPA terminating UKPC
which makes the BPA a very dubious organisation and
not fit for purpose as an ATA0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards