We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Landlord vanishes with my deposit!
Comments
-
Not only can you put a charge on the landlords house, you can force it's sale as well. It's cheap and easy to do... the rules changed in April 2006, now anyone owed money can easily and cheaply put a charge againsts the debtors house and if the debtor doesnt pay within 30 days, force the sale.
Effectively, all debt is now secured on your property.
You're off again with this "the rules changed in 2006" :rolleyes: :rolleyes: . For the 79th time, provide an official source for this alleged "rules change" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The simple fact of the matter is that you can't, because no rules have changed.
You should be banned from the forums for talking bull !!!!. :rolleyes:
Rob0 -
Snooze - don't be so unkind :rotfl: Squat's posts can often brighten up a dull thread.
I maybe wrong but I think this is maybe something that Squat plucked off an HPC post, and it's not a proper interpretation.
Originally a charging order could only be obtained against your property after you'd defaulted on a CCJ,but the CABs and debt advisory folk weren't happy about provision with the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, that would apparently allow such an order to be made even where there had been no default. The idea is apparently to close the loophole that debtors use to avoid paying a debt off by claiming that their only asset is their home.
Anyway, see here for the Act in all its shinyness: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2007/pdf/ukpga_20070015_en.pdf All very interesting but at this time of day I can't be bothered to trawl through it.
I have heard that some councils have pushed people towards bankruptcy over unpaid C Tax using charging orders etc, and it does seem that some collection agencies will try hard to get debtors to agree to a voluntary charging order without them realising the full consequences.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards