We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Problems with insurance claims with Post Office
Comments
-
daveonline wrote: »izzyh,
Don't want to heap more problems on you but when you take out new insurance you'll have to disclose that you've had insurance cancelled and the reason why !!!
Thanks for that, but I have already notified my new insurers of it , and they insured my without any problem , even with my 2 sp 30's0 -
Thanks, for your comment, thats what nobody seems to believe, my interpretation of 'conviction' was appearing in court, and obviously i naively did not think my fixed penalties were classed as convictions - maybe it would be better if you were asked on the application - do you have any of the following, and a list offences following to be able to choose from.brightonman123 wrote: »depends on people's version on ther term 'conviction'- to me that would involve a cour case, not a fixed penalty / points added by some !!!!!! in a hat..
Anyway, it seems that I am to receive nothing for my 3 year old car being written off, meanwhile the police have implied that the hit and run driver was under the influence of drugs and had no insurance, and will probably be back driving on the streets until he is caught again0 -
well you obviously have your views on me, which you are entitled to, but i really came on this sight to look for advice and perhaps wondered if anyone else had gone through this, not to be labelled thick and a blatant con merchant to a blatant judgemental person like yourself0
-
Oooooooohhhh wrote: »Sorry but you got caught speeding and got a fine, what part of that doesnt scream motoring conviction
If it was just the fine fair enough but you got points too, I simply dont believe you or anyone else who accidentally leaves out material facts and as a result "accidentally" gets cheaper insurance
Also, my new insurer, who i have made aware of all the facts of this disaster, has insured me even cheaper than the post office, so you do have it wrong that i was , in your words, accidentally leaving out material facts to incite a cheaper insurance0 -
Its irrespective whether you believe it or notOooooooohhhh wrote: »Again simply dont believe that
If you have fully disclosed you had insurance withdrawn for misrepresentation you would be lucky to get insured never mind reasonably cheap
I object to being branded a liar from some anonymous person who does not even know me0 -
Yes , so do IOooooooohhhh wrote: »I object to insurance fraud0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards