We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Spousal Maintainance - Pls Help
masonj3
Posts: 202 Forumite
Hi
Apologies in advance as this will prob be a long post.
My dad married in 1969 and had a child in 1971. His wife left him when the child was 18 months old and filed for a divorce - her parents had had a win on the pools and felt my dad wasnt good enough for her or their child!
My dad had to pay maintainance for his child and a spousal maintance for his wife unless she remarried. When the child reached 16 and did not continue in education my dad was notified that he would no longer have to pay maintainance for his child, the spousal maintainance however was still owed and my dad continued to pay it.
My mom and dad have been together for 30+ years and have worked hard in the last 10 years and have two properties , small savings and decent personal pensions. My dad recently became ill and now has some mental health problems and is physically disabled, his only income now are from his benefits, my mom works part time and may well need to give up work as my dads care needs are increasing.
About six months ago we found out that my dads ex wife was co-habiting and had been for some years and has a property with this partner, my dad felt he shouldnt need to be continuing to pay a spousal maintainance to her anymore and decided he wouldnt pay it and see what happens. He has received a letter this morning from the court sayin he owes arrears and that he needs to make payment and keep up the regular payments too.
Im needing some advice on where we can go from here, the repayments are £4 per week so not a massive figure but dont feel its fair that she is supported by my dad still after all this time given the short amount of time they were married, we would like to challenge the fact that he has to make payment but have reservations that his ex may well end up being entitled to more of my dads assets now if we rock the boat, also we would like the court to be aware that she is cohabiting and in a financial relationship with someone else.
Any ideas on what we can do? Or is there anyone who has been in a similar position?
Thanks x
Apologies in advance as this will prob be a long post.
My dad married in 1969 and had a child in 1971. His wife left him when the child was 18 months old and filed for a divorce - her parents had had a win on the pools and felt my dad wasnt good enough for her or their child!
My dad had to pay maintainance for his child and a spousal maintance for his wife unless she remarried. When the child reached 16 and did not continue in education my dad was notified that he would no longer have to pay maintainance for his child, the spousal maintainance however was still owed and my dad continued to pay it.
My mom and dad have been together for 30+ years and have worked hard in the last 10 years and have two properties , small savings and decent personal pensions. My dad recently became ill and now has some mental health problems and is physically disabled, his only income now are from his benefits, my mom works part time and may well need to give up work as my dads care needs are increasing.
About six months ago we found out that my dads ex wife was co-habiting and had been for some years and has a property with this partner, my dad felt he shouldnt need to be continuing to pay a spousal maintainance to her anymore and decided he wouldnt pay it and see what happens. He has received a letter this morning from the court sayin he owes arrears and that he needs to make payment and keep up the regular payments too.
Im needing some advice on where we can go from here, the repayments are £4 per week so not a massive figure but dont feel its fair that she is supported by my dad still after all this time given the short amount of time they were married, we would like to challenge the fact that he has to make payment but have reservations that his ex may well end up being entitled to more of my dads assets now if we rock the boat, also we would like the court to be aware that she is cohabiting and in a financial relationship with someone else.
Any ideas on what we can do? Or is there anyone who has been in a similar position?
Thanks x
0
Comments
-
http://www.brookman.co.uk/areas_of_law/spousal_main.php
What were the terms of the original spousal maintenance order?:cool:0 -
Thanks for replying dippy chick, just had a look at the original order. It states the following:-
That the child would remain in legal custody of the mother
Defendant to pay the court a weekly sum of £4 for the benefit of the complainant together with a weekly sum of £3 for maintance of the child until the age of 16 years - paid to the complainant
The complainant will grant the defendant reasonable access to the said child and defendant shall give notice of any change of address
That is all the info on the court order,
There is a letter from the court which was issued at the same time advising how my dad could make the payments at the end of the letter it stated that if my dad and his ex were to reconcile and cohabit then both parties needed to inform the court and if his ex remarried then the court needed to be informed in writing immediately.0 -
My dad had a basic letter from the courts in 1987 when his son reached 16 advising he no longer needed to pay for his son but the spousal maintance of £4 per week needed to continue, very basic & brief letter - no other info
Thanks x0 -
Hmmm
Well your Dad was bloody lucky getting off with paying the £3 a week in Child Maintenance all these years!!!
That is less than the CSA would take off people on a Giro of about £43 a week!!!
Have you tried to get some free advice from a Family Law solicitor?
Perhaps find a Law forum and ask!
Sorry that I can't be of more help
:cool:0 -
Thanks dippychick will try and find some free advice somewhere x0
-
Dippychick wrote: »Hmmm
Well your Dad was bloody lucky getting off with paying the £3 a week in Child Maintenance all these years!!!
That is less than the CSA would take off people on a Giro of about £43 a week!!!
Have you tried to get some free advice from a Family Law solicitor?
Perhaps find a Law forum and ask!
Sorry that I can't be of more help
Now, be fair! Between 1973 and 1985 £3 was worth a good deal more than it is today and with the £4 spousal support that would have been a sizeable chunk of the average income.0 -
Oldernotwiser wrote: »Now, be fair! Between 1973 and 1985 £3 was worth a good deal more than it is today and with the £4 spousal support that would have been a sizeable chunk of the average income.
My hubby said the same!!:cool:0 -
Oldernotwiser wrote: »Now, be fair! Between 1973 and 1985 £3 was worth a good deal more than it is today and with the £4 spousal support that would have been a sizeable chunk of the average income.
At around that time I was earning £8 a week and I paid rent out of that
Why should anyone be paying for an ex wife, children yes obviously, but a fit adult?Loretta0 -
GOING OFF-TOPIC
Hi, Martin’s asked me to post this in these circumstances: While it’s easy to wander off-topic that often prevents newbies finding the information they want quickly and easily (please see this rule). Please keep this thread on topic. If you’d like to discuss non-MoneySaving related topics please continue your discussion in The MoneySavers Arms or Discussion Time. If you have any questions about this policy please email [EMAIL="%20abuse@moneysavingexpert.com"]!!!!!![/EMAIL].Signature removed for peace of mind0 -
I think the problem your parents will face is this. Your dad is liable for £208 per year in spousal maintenance. To be able to stop these payments he will need to go to court to get the existing court order varied. Judging by the assets you list he will not be able to claim legal aid. The cost of going to court, unless he represents himself, may well far exceed any savings he makes by stopping the SM. So unless he is fighting purely on the principle of the issue he could be out of pocket.No reliance should be placed on the above.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards