We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
House Price Crash!
Options
Comments
-
meanmachine wrote:Depends entirely on where you live, of course. In my neck of the woods (SE) I've saved around 3K by not buying. END OF STORY.
Hey... let's start up the 'well how much has it cost you to rent' discussion...CarQuake / Ergo Digital0 -
ag359 wrote:Thank you, I am fully aware of that - my original post was not without a little touch of the devil's advocate. However, the replies baffled me a little, so I couldn't let them go unanswered...
Again, thanks for your kind advice.
Never touched him! Honest, ref!I can spell - but I can't type0 -
It's worth remembering what Merryn Somerset Webb says in her Sunday Times articles: it's not enough to look at prices alone, you also have to look at volume. Suppose a year ago 1,000 houses sold at £100K each. This year, one house sells for £110K and all the rest remain unsold. If you look at prices alone, you'll think that the market has gone up by 10%, which is a very false impression.
I have seen perfectly good houses in London not selling or taking many months to sell. So even though prices may be rising a little, it doesn't mean the market is in great health.Eh?? I give up!! Towel is getting thrown in here!0 -
greenwich wrote:It's worth remembering what Merryn Somerset Webb says in her Sunday Times articles: it's not enough to look at prices alone, you also have to look at volume. Suppose a year ago 1,000 houses sold at £100K each. This year, one house sells for £110K and all the rest remain unsold. If you look at prices alone, you'll think that the market has gone up by 10%, which is a very false impression.
I have seen perfectly good houses in London not selling or taking many months to sell. So even though prices may be rising a little, it doesn't mean the market is in great health.
Yeh, and theres a cost associated with the delayed sale thats not being taken into account. Less money sloshing aroudn the system for DIY, estate agents pockets, and further along the food chain.0 -
Let's be honest - house prices today are the hangover from a stable economy and high employment.
After eight years of rises, no wonder they've ended up so ridiculously high.
But in the last few weeks two of my mates have lost their jobs, and they've told me there's nothing out there - at least not before Xmas.
Luckily for them, they both bought before 2000, and so have manageable mortgages.
But god knows what anyone else would do - particuarly those who bought recently.
I'm also almost prepared to admit that banks and EAs aren't to blame for rampant house price inflation. The general public have, for years, been perfectly willing to "pay more than the next man".
Right now I'm not sure where the market's heading. The recent rise in borrowing does point to a stabilisation. But if the economy continues to suffer, bills keep going up, then house prices will reflect the wider picture.
Let's be honest - for homeowners, it's been a lovely long party. But if people don't have jobs, they can't buy property - at any price!0 -
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4366376.stm
The trend appears to be following 88/9 i.e. the last Property crash. I know people will say "things are different this time" with Interest rares being low etc. However the Economy is not in good shape and Unemployment is rising.0 -
John_M_Business wrote:Hey... let's start up the 'well how much has it cost you to rent' discussion...
Ho-hum, I swore I wasn't gonna get drawn into this one but I cannot help myself :rolleyes: John, are we forgetting the cost of mortgage payments here again???0 -
rozeepozee wrote:Ho-hum, I swore I wasn't gonna get drawn into this one but I cannot help myself :rolleyes: John, are we forgetting the cost of mortgage payments here again???
Yes, but the difference between rent payments and mortgage payments is that after the term of the mortgage YOU OWN THE HOUSE, with rent, the Landlord owns the house! Surely that is the major factor here is it not? Someone in their 50's who bought years ago now owns their house, no mortgage, life of riley, tons of money (like my parents) however, same couple had they rented house, they would STILL BE PAYING rent until their dying day, poorer, less secure and no-doubt moving house every year/six months as tenancies ran out! There is no economic sense to renting! None at all!~What you send out comes back to thee thricefold!~~0 -
mystic_trev wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4366376.stm
The trend appears to be following 88/9 i.e. the last Property crash. I know people will say "things are different this time" with Interest rares being low etc. However the Economy is not in good shape and Unemployment is rising.
Economically and socially things may well be different this time.
However, house price inflation for the lead up to the peak of each boom is no different.
Halifax data
1984 7.2 --- 1999 7.2
1985 9.1 --- 2000 9.8
1986 11.0 --- 2001 8.5
1987 15.4 --- 2002 17.4
1988 23.3 --- 2003 22.4
1989 20.8 --- 2004 18.3
1990 0.0 --- 2005 3.00 -
Ember999 wrote:Yes, but the difference between rent payments and mortgage payments is that after the term of the mortgage YOU OWN THE HOUSE, with rent, the Landlord owns the house! Surely that is the major factor here is it not? Someone in their 50's who bought years ago now owns their house, no mortage, life of riley, tons of money (like my parents) however, same couple had they rented house, they would STILL BE PAYING rent until their dying day, poorer, less secure and no-doubt moving house every year/six months as tenancies ran out! There is no economic sense to renting! None at all!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards