We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Halifax to relaunch regular saver @10%+
Options
Comments
-
I take that as a "Yes you can" :TYou've never seen me, but I've been here all along - watching and learning...:cool:0 -
alternatively - would Halifax actually detect the difference between a SO and a payment - they both use BACS dont they ?[/quote]
The Halifax accounts allow you to just see BACS transfers and my SOs from Barclays are shown as BACS, as you say, so I'll transfer my money in manually on the 1st of the month. I timed one just now - at a weekend. It took 2 minutes to show up. I'm hoping the sort code for the new 10% shows up on the APACS checker.0 -
more here http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/saving-and-banking/article.html?in_article_id=442612&in_page_id=7&ct=5If you continue to save after your deposit reaches £5,000 and do not lower it again below that mark, the 2% bonus interest kicks in and you will earn an additional £65, bringing the total amount of interest to £390.
Surely, this part is wrong?0 -
Speculator wrote: »Surely, this part is wrong?
Absolutely! :mad:0 -
I'm not sure why does this new RS account attracts so much interest or I have missed something here.
The new 10% will give you £325 at the end of one year provided, you make a £500 (Full) payment. That means £6000 at the end of one year. How about taking a, say one year fixed (again, at Halifax to compare) at 6%+, which would easily give you £360++.
Can anyone explain that to me.?Conjugating the verb 'to be":
-o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries0 -
The current rules for the 7% say that subsequent payments must be by SO. ... Does anyone use payments rather than SOs to their 7% successfully without contravening this rule?
Note that a Standing Order is nothing but a repeated BACS payment for your convenience. Whether you initiate the payment manually or set up a SO at the sending bank is not distinguishable for the recipient.
Obviously, some banks are gradually moving to Faster Payments now but I do not presume that a FP pay-in would be against the T&Cs.Dagobert0 -
0
-
when I tried to apply, it brings up the following message......Regular Saver application ineligible
Unfortunately you cannot continue with this Regular Saver application for one or more of the following reasons:- You do not meet our age requirements
- You already hold the maximum number of Regular Saver accounts we allow
So it confirms that I will have to close my existing regular saver to open this one.0 -
I have already closed my existing Regular Saver account last Friday but when I tried to apply online a moment ago I still got the same message - now what?0
-
I have already closed my existing Regular Saver account last Friday but when I tried to apply online a moment ago I still got the same message - now what?
Let us know how you get on - I may as well wait to hear your experiences.
I was upset this morning cos I logged in at 6:30 (sad, I know) and it was still showing at 7% thenYou've never seen me, but I've been here all along - watching and learning...:cool:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards