We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The Truth About Property - BBC2 Monday night 8pm

135

Comments

  • dean_ham
    dean_ham Posts: 277 Forumite
    That BTL guy that was worth 500M talked sence.
    Wonder what his next move will be after shifting all them properties.
  • phil_b_2
    phil_b_2 Posts: 995 Forumite
    What a complete pile of sh*t. I cant remember the last time I saw something so ludicrous.

    The scene that took the biscuit was where she was telling that woman what her flat would be worth when she hits retirement.
    Predicting 35 years into the future ?!?!? Are all doom'mongers as utterly idiotic and farcicle as those two idiots???? They took the crystal ball theorem to a whole new level PMSL!

    They seemed to weed out only those with a pessamistic view of the future, and found one retard (letting agent guy) with optimism in some deliberate attempt to belittle the positive folk. The condesending facial expressions pulled when anyone mentioned prices being strong somewhere showed a very clear agenda behind the show and its creators. Full of bias and attempted brain washing as far as I could tell.

    I for one am more confident those predicting huge drops are off their rockers after that show!

    I must say, I do applaud them though, making an effort to push further a crash to the benefit of todays generation, who are undoubtedly struggling to buy a home of any kind. I'm sure many have more hope of being able to buy a house in the future.
  • phil_b wrote: »

    The scene that took the biscuit was where she was telling that woman what her flat would be worth when she hits retirement.
    Predicting 35 years into the future ?!?!? Are all doom'mongers as utterly idiotic and farcicle as those two idiots???? They took the crystal ball theorem to a whole new level PMSL!

    Yep, I wish I had the same crystal ball!

    Also, and maybe I was just being thick, when they were taking out the costs from her 'profit' why did they remove the cost of her mortgage. Surely that should only be removed if she just left the house empty? If she is getting rent that should cover, if not all, at least some of the mortgage? Of course, I might have misunderstood it completely!
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I missed it.
    I can never remember when programmes are on.
  • brit1234
    brit1234 Posts: 5,385 Forumite
    :exclamatiScams - Shared Equity, Shared Ownership, Newbuy, Firstbuy and Help to Buy.

    Save our Savers
  • neas
    neas Posts: 3,801 Forumite
    Morale of the story is... houses can go down as well as up..
  • julz1982
    julz1982 Posts: 30 Forumite
    I really wanted to hate the guy with the ridiculous hair cut and bleached blonde "goatie" but he actually spoke a lot of sense, so I ended up liking him! First impressions can be wrong.
  • lethal0r
    lethal0r Posts: 408 Forumite
    they made some good points. not really an hours worth of material though. just a heads up for where the market is right now.
  • martinman3
    martinman3 Posts: 727 Forumite
    Also, and maybe I was just being thick, when they were taking out the costs from her 'profit' why did they remove the cost of her mortgage. Surely that should only be removed if she just left the house empty? If she is getting rent that should cover, if not all, at least some of the mortgage? Of course, I might have misunderstood it completely!

    Although they didn't mention it, I assume that the mortgage would be interest only and she would need to sell to get access to her "pension". That is the problem with relying on an increase in equity alone, if she could afford a repayment mortgage she could keep the property and live off the rent once mortgage was repaid.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.