We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Insuring a car not thats not in my name
Comments
-
samgoffe wrote:I have a form i have to fill out and state where i live and what test centre. The page has a list of 40 or so, the closest to me is :
VOSA
RTE Division
Bicester GVTS
Launton Road
Bicester
Oxon
OX26 0JG
01869 243416
So a VOSA approved i assume :S
Have you tried the next closest to see if they can do it sooner? (They might just refer you back to the closest though).If you lend someone a tenner and never see them again, it was probably worth it.0 -
yes, its quite a distance for a "dodgy" car
But none of them answer the phones, i have tried quite a few times.0 -
samgoffe wrote:yes, its quite a distance for a "dodgy" car
But none of them answer the phones, i have tried quite a few times.
Keep trying! Sorry, don't think I can be of any more assistance here...If you lend someone a tenner and never see them again, it was probably worth it.0 -
mrbadexample wrote:Keep trying! Sorry, don't think I can be of any more assistance here...
There quote was a bit on the high side ....
.....£2600 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Are they joking?
Thats fully comp (3rd party was only £100 cheaper), 2 accidents last year, someone hit me and i rolled a car. 19 year old male, no NCB and in a low post code area.0 -
No joke!! And maybe not what you want to hear Sam, BUT ...
Insurance is based on perceived risk and you're right at the top of an underwriters highest risk profile. You're male, 19, with 2 previous accidents [claims on either?] - for them you're a distaster waiting to happen!! Reason it's only £100 cheaper for TPFT is the most expensive risk they're insuring is you causing an accident which injures someone 3rd party, and leads to 10's maybe 100's of thousands of pounds in compen payouts.
Most mainstream insurers want to cherry-pick middle-aged drivers with 5+yrs NCB as they are the best risk and, as such, can get very low premiums.
Just done a google search for car+insurance+young+driver and there are several specialists you might want to try, one's HERE. But do the search yourself and try them all. Of course they may not be one's who will insure a car that you're not reg keeper of.
Alternatively, check local yellow pages and see if you can find a broker who specialises in young drivers and let them do the legwork. BoL.0 -
Ian_W wrote:No joke!! And maybe not what you want to hear Sam, BUT ...
Insurance is based on perceived risk and you're right at the top of an underwriters highest risk profile. You're male, 19, with 2 previous accidents [claims on either?] - for them you're a distaster waiting to happen!! Reason it's only £100 cheaper for TPFT is the most expensive risk they're insuring is you causing an accident which injures someone 3rd party, and leads to 10's maybe 100's of thousands of pounds in compen payouts.
Most mainstream insurers want to cherry-pick middle-aged drivers with 5+yrs NCB as they are the best risk and, as such, can get very low premiums.
Just done a google search for car+insurance+young+driver and there are several specialists you might want to try, one's HERE. But do the search yourself and try them all. Of course they may not be one's who will insure a car that you're not reg keeper of.
Alternatively, check local yellow pages and see if you can find a broker who specialises in young drivers and let them do the legwork. BoL.
That site looks dodgy as hell by the way, i wouldnt use them!0 -
OK Sam, it is a Joke!!
Goes like this,
contact an insurer for a quote, if they do that line of insurance there's an unwritten rule that they will always quote.
Get a ridiculous price from them, like here ... and the punchline is ....
They don't want your business! :rotfl:
Sorry, you found the link "dodgy" and the rest of the post wasn't more helpful. :rolleyes:0 -
Keithwales is correct about needing an insurable interest...however there is no point expecting definitive definitions as there are very large books on insurance law setting out the arguments people have had over this. In practice, companies will insure cars of which you are not the registered keeper - I own the policy on our car - my husband is the registered keeper. (Done because he was at work the day we bought it and so I had access to the phone and arranged the insurance). Both Direct Line and Tesco have insured on that basis, and Tesco has paid a claim with no quibbles over this. It did take some explaining however when I took out the policies and again when I got the documents.
But you should not confuse being the registered keeper with ownership - they are not the same thing, nor is being the registered keeper the only way you can have the necessary insurable interest.
Good luck.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards