We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Littlewoods and my rights ?

Options
Hi , I dont know if i am putting this in the right place but here goes .....

I ordered a self assembly wardrobe from littlewoods for £169 and waited in today for them to arrive . When they turned up they showed me a bit of paper for me to sign for 3 boxes (all 3 boxes had my name on them).
I lugged the boxes upstairs and opened the first one only to discover a different item , so I quickly checked the other two boxes and realised all 3 were not for me at all , they were completely different items worth £800:eek: .

so being honest i phoned littlewoods , they asked me to open every box to check again , so we were on the phone for 35 mins, then they said they will collect the boxes on the 2 june .
I said they are massive big boxes standing in my hallway and i feel they are dangerous to my kids and dog and can they collect them sooner and they said no.
They told me i was legally obliged to hold onto them until they can collect them. I tried telling them i want them collected within a week but they wont do that.
Kindness costs nothing :)
«1

Comments

  • michilin27
    michilin27 Posts: 204 Forumite
    ah, littlewoods! had a horrid time with littlewoods recently, bascially i waited in on three diff days for them to collect goods and they never turned up!! eventually had to quote distance selling regulations as they were refusing a refund until i had returned the goods- even though they were preventing the refund by not turning up! my complaint eventually got passed to directors office and i was told to destroy goods and she would issue a refund!!

    01/06 is over a month away! call them again!

    good luck
    Northern Ireland member 324- getting hitched Sept 2012!:j:j
  • mdbarber
    mdbarber Posts: 1,116 Forumite
    yeah you don't really have to put up with this you can either
    a contact (1st class recorded)them again giving a reasonable deadline/time for collection 1 week should be enough you can always say u will try it on in court as unsolicited goods (prob wouldn't win but will scare the crap outta them)

    b do as above but state charges will apply "for storage" after that date
    its a lotta money so don't do anything rash

    c contact citizens advice for any other options
    click here to achieve nothing!
  • SaraSeahorse
    SaraSeahorse Posts: 582 Forumite
    mdbarber wrote: »
    you can always say u will try it on in court as unsolicited goods

    not unsolicited goods as op had placed order, it is a mistake / error - big difference between !!!! up and unsolicited goods

    mdbarber wrote: »
    (prob wouldn't win but will scare the crap outta them)

    No I doubt it would at all, people threatening things with no grounds / in the wrong does not scare a company like Littlewoods

    mdbarber wrote: »
    c contact citizens advice for any other options

    most sensible thing you have said
    Baby Milk Action is a non-profit organisation which aims to save lives and to end the avoidable suffering caused by inappropriate infant feeding.
  • advent1122
    advent1122 Posts: 1,403 Forumite
    Tell them to collect the next working day or they will be left in the garden to get stolen or !!!!!! on.
    A month???? The cheeky gits.
  • Blacksheep1979
    Blacksheep1979 Posts: 4,224 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Give them a reasonable deadline to collect ( a week wouldn't be unreasonable for a large company like this) and then state you will charge for storage at £20 a day there after.
  • mdbarber
    mdbarber Posts: 1,116 Forumite
    not unsolicited goods as op had placed order, it is a mistake / error - big difference between !!!! up and unsolicited goods

    No I doubt it would at all, people threatening things with no grounds / in the wrong does not scare a company like Littlewoods

    most sensible thing you have said

    Actually i was once told to do that by trading standards and citizens advice over a similar issue, they hadn't heard of any precedent on it and it worked for me
    As i said for that quantity of money it was unlikely to actually win in court but as often pointed out on here the retailers really don't know the soga that well, so using their ignorance against them can be an effective ploy
    click here to achieve nothing!
  • IvanOpinion
    IvanOpinion Posts: 22,136 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I had a similar problem quite a few years back (not with Littlewoods but a different catalogue that my wife had ordered from). I told them that I would keep the items safe in my house for a period of 1 week but following that I would no longer accept responsibility for them and they would be left outside, irrespective of weather .. and I may have mentioned it was bonfire season so some of the local kids may show a bit of interest in them.

    They picked them up before the end of the week.

    ivan
    I don't care about your first world problems; I have enough of my own!
  • Had a similar problem too ages back. They delivered the wardrobe we'd ordered then turned up with another as well, and said they'd pick it up when they could basically. We just put it in the back garden, prolly got ruined but there was no room in the house to store a massive wardrobe!
  • dmg24
    dmg24 Posts: 33,920 Forumite
    10,000 Posts
    mdbarber wrote: »
    Actually i was once told to do that by trading standards and citizens advice over a similar issue, they hadn't heard of any precedent on it and it worked for me
    As i said for that quantity of money it was unlikely to actually win in court but as often pointed out on here the retailers really don't know the soga that well, so using their ignorance against them can be an effective ploy

    So if TS and CAB did not know of a precedent on it, then how can it be good advice? I don't know if it is you or them that are stupid!

    The 'quantity of money' is irrelevant for a court case, it is the law that matters.

    Perhaps you should go and learn something about the law before giving people such shockingly bad advice?!
    Gone ... or have I?
  • mdbarber
    mdbarber Posts: 1,116 Forumite
    dmg24 wrote: »
    So if TS and CAB did not know of a precedent on it, then how can it be good advice? I don't know if it is you or them that are stupid!

    The 'quantity of money' is irrelevant for a court case, it is the law that matters.

    Perhaps you should go and learn something about the law before giving people such shockingly bad advice?!

    As i said "TWICE" it was presented as a bluff because there was no precedent, the quantity of money being a deciding factor in "it could go either way" so would be bloody stupid to risk getting sued for unless you can afford to throw that amount away.
    Before implying people are stupid you should learn that mis-interpretation is one of the facts of life, maybe mine on advice received, maybe yours in the reading, either way a polite request for an explanation would have sufficed.
    click here to achieve nothing!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.