Band charges

exel1966

Tozer wrote: »

Must have been very subtle sarcasm as I didn't notice it.

Obviously you have a problem understanding what :rolleyes: means then as well as your problem with stalking people on these forums !!

YorkshireBoy

exel1966 wrote: »

Obviously you have a problem understanding what :rolleyes: means then...

To be fair exel, I thought she was rolling her eyes at herself for not being able to find the correct forum.

NickX

exel1966 wrote: »

Obviously you have a problem understanding what :rolleyes: means then as well as your problem with stalking people on these forums !!

I believe :rolleyes: refers to sarcasm which as I stated appears to be non-existent.

Now please would you explain your comment on stalking people ?

exel1966

NickX wrote: »

There was no sarcasm here IMO and your response isn't very pleasant.

Exel1966 the forum etiquette says "Pls be nice to all Moneysavers. There is no such thing as a stupid question, and even if you disagree courtesy helps".

Whereas IMO there clearly was hence the :rolleyes: (rolls eyes, sarcastically) aimed at me !

I'm well aware of the forum etiquette, perhaps you should aquaint yourself with it !

exel1966

NickX wrote: »

I believe :rolleyes: refers to sarcasm which as I stated appears to be non-existent.

Now please would you explain your comment on stalking people ?

As my comments have nothing to do with you I'll refrain from expanding on them here.

NickX

exel1966 wrote: »

Whereas IMO there clearly was hence the :rolleyes: (rolls eyes, sarcastically) aimed at me !

I'm well aware of the forum etiquette, perhaps you should aquaint yourself with it !

OK I didn't take the :rolleyes: as an sarcastic attack on you, however you obviously saw it differently. Only the OP will be able to say how they meant the use of this particular symbol.

If you are suggesting that I am not following the forum etiquette in some way, please do point out what I have done wrong. I certainly do my best to remain courteous even when in disagreement, and I simply thought the tone of your response(s) were rather strong.

NickX

exel1966 wrote: »

As my comments have nothing to do with you I'll refrain from expanding on them here.

My mistake, I thought the "stalking" comment was directed at me, read the post too quickly - I do apologise :beer:

exel1966

NickX wrote: »

OK I didn't take the :rolleyes: as an sarcastic attack on you, however you obviously saw it differently. Only the OP will be able to say how they meant the use of this particular symbol.

If you are suggesting that I am not following the forum etiquette in some way, please do point out what I have done wrong. I certainly do my best to remain courteous even when in disagreement, and I simply thought the tone of your response(s) were rather strong.

We'll agree to differ on the meaning of :rolleyes: . I merely use the meaning the site clearly states. My tone was in response to the tone of the OP's by using the :rolleyes: .

exel1966

NickX wrote: »

My mistake, I thought the "stalking" comment was directed at me, read the post too quickly - I do apologise :beer:

I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion as I clearly quoted remarks from Toser ! Is there a connection ?

NickX

exel1966 wrote: »

I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion as I clearly quoted remarks from Toser ! Is there a connection ?

I just read your response, and didn't read that you had quoted Tozer, so I assumed you were responding to me - simple mistake, nothing more.

There is no connection between me and Tozer (or anyone else on this board for that matter).