We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Premium Bond Winner ?
Comments
-
50 on full holding of 50
Nothing in December, so I'm pleased with anything today0 -
£50 for me 2x£25 for wife, both full holding.I am not a cat (But my friend is)0
-
Not a sausage for my £31,600 holding this month.
The bigger the bargain, the better I feel.
I should mention that there's only one of me, don't confuse me with others of the same name.0 -
£25 on £50k for me0
-
Since the new rates, £100 again - on a double full holding; so well ahead.AND they've got the purchase date sorting correctly - at last.
0 -
£125 on a total holding of £80k0
-
£25 on full holding"It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"
G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP0 -
£100 on £36k holding - it was my first draw too so I'm really happy with that!0
-
It makes enough difference for me to want it (that is where my opinion comes into it) if it doesn't make enough difference for you want it that is where your opinion comes into it.eskbanker said:
But putting aside opinions about whether or not this would be a good idea, it's a mathematical fact that doing so would only increase the number of prizes by no more than about 1.3%, so realistically it would have little effect....chucknorris said:I know opinion is divided, but probably like you, I would have preferred only 1 million monthly prize with more smaller monthly prizesChuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop1 -
My post wasn't expressing any opinion about whether or not I want it, but was simply observing the fact that your preferred alternative would only generate 1.3% more prizes, which is objectively a small increase by any measure (but all the more so in the context of the recent prize fund reduction of nearly 30%).chucknorris said:
It makes enough difference for me to want it (that is where my opinion comes into it) if it doesn't make enough difference for you want it that is where your opinion comes into it.eskbanker said:
But putting aside opinions about whether or not this would be a good idea, it's a mathematical fact that doing so would only increase the number of prizes by no more than about 1.3%, so realistically it would have little effect....chucknorris said:I know opinion is divided, but probably like you, I would have preferred only 1 million monthly prize with more smaller monthly prizes4
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards