We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Student Loan for 2 children at uni at same time

Hi

Can anyone tell me if the student loan/maintainance grant criteria with regards to parental income is different if as a parent you have 2 children at Uni at the same time?
«13

Comments

  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    Nope. Same as if one was and one isn't.
  • onthemend
    onthemend Posts: 443 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    So therefore as a parent who has to contribute to make up the shortfall, I have to contribute 2 times as much just because both kids are at uni at the same time?
  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    onthemend wrote: »
    So therefore as a parent who has to contribute to make up the shortfall, I have to contribute 2 times as much just because both kids are at uni at the same time?

    No because you don't have to contribute anything, thats what the student loans there for.
  • aah
    aah Posts: 520 Forumite
    utter c***. there is an expectation of parental contribution to the loan; the loan is reduced in order for that to take place. it does seem entirely unfair that a parent should contribute twice as much taxed income when there are 2 kids at uni. when divorced or separated parents get grants and loans on the basis of one income only - and very often the estranged parent contributes too, but their income isnt assessed towards the loan - the state (you and me) pays.

    me and oh earn between us 50 - 55k son gets nothing (3k loan) and we are expected to pay 1100 towards his exps.

    sons girlfriend: mother earns 10k, father 80k. loan and grant assessed on mum's income - student gets 3k full grant doesnt have to pay it back. gets bursary help with fees - free. dad pays her rent - 3k!

    so they are quids in and it will be the same with next sibling....
  • poet123
    poet123 Posts: 24,099 Forumite
    Yes, we have 2 there too,and get no help at all as we are in the same position re income. Friends children who are divorced get everything,and the father's income is not taken into account. Totally unfair.
  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    aah wrote: »
    utter c***. there is an expectation of parental contribution to the loan; the loan is reduced in order for that to take place. it does seem entirely unfair that a parent should contribute twice as much taxed income when there are 2 kids at uni. when divorced or separated parents get grants and loans on the basis of one income only - and very often the estranged parent contributes too, but their income isnt assessed towards the loan - the state (you and me) pays.

    me and oh earn between us 50 - 55k son gets nothing (3k loan) and we are expected to pay 1100 towards his exps.

    sons girlfriend: mother earns 10k, father 80k. loan and grant assessed on mum's income - student gets 3k full grant doesnt have to pay it back. gets bursary help with fees - free. dad pays her rent - 3k!

    so they are quids in and it will be the same with next sibling....

    This is one of the most rediculous posts I have ever read. It is assessed on household income, which means the parents aren't together, just because the dad decides to help his daughter, doesn't m ean he has to, he chooses to.

    Not everyone is like this, its one person, just because the system doesn't work for everyone doesn't mean you have to go slagging it off. My dad hasn't paid m y mum anything for years and years (since he got married again, so 6 years I think) so me and my brother have been living of my mums income of £24k a year. Now she has a boyfriend his income takes me over the limit of a grant, so I don't get one either, but I don't moan just because moneys tight.

    Bringing up 2 children on £55k between you is damn fine, there are others out there without even half that so stop being so arrogant and thinking you are the worst off!

    Why are you expected to pay £1100 to his expenses? He can get a job and earn that much parttime.

    Absolutely dreadful, your kids will be 18+ they should be able to look after themselves by this age.
  • dmg24
    dmg24 Posts: 33,920 Forumite
    10,000 Posts
    Agree with Lokolo, and I imagine those with divorced parents would give all the money in the world to have them back together.
    Gone ... or have I?
  • Oldernotwiser
    Oldernotwiser Posts: 37,425 Forumite
    Absolutely agree; that's part of the rationale of the switch to loans that funding moves from the parent to the student.

    Why is it always the people with money who moan about the cost of things?
  • poet123
    poet123 Posts: 24,099 Forumite
    The point is when parents divorce,they divorce each other and should not be allowed by the state to divorce thenslves from the upkeep of their children. Regardless of whether the split is amicable the other parties income should be assessed, and they should be made to contribute just as happens via the CSA(or should do if the system was operated correctly).

    Why should the state support via grants, children who should/could be supported by the absent parent?

    Those with money(and it is all relative) do not get it by accident,but generally by extreme hard work,long hours,copious amounts of study and not a little sacrifice. So if they moan it may be justified,but moaning about being overburdened by tax and other state sanctioned dues is not the preserve of those with money,it is universal.
  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    poet123 wrote: »
    The point is when parents divorce,they divorce each other and should not be allowed by the state to divorce thenslves from the upkeep of their children. Regardless of whether the split is amicable the other parties income should be assessed, and they should be made to contribute just as happens via the CSA(or should do if the system was operated correctly).

    Why should the state support via grants, children who should/could be supported by the absent parent?

    Those with money(and it is all relative) do not get it by accident,but generally by extreme hard work,long hours,copious amounts of study and not a little sacrifice. So if they moan it may be justified,but moaning about being overburdened by tax and other state sanctioned dues is not the preserve of those with money,it is universal.

    So you're saying that my mum doesn't earn more than £24k because she doesn't try hard?

    My mum usually works 9-7 on an average day on IT support. A few years ago she did a HND part time and then lead onto a degree, and still earns £24k.... so she doesn't try hard? Really?

    Just because absent parents should contribute, doesn't mean they will or can.

    And well why should your children who are going to uni now get £1k payback in tuitions fees in their first year? I didn't. I paid the whole amount and don't get anything back.

    The system sucks, get over it, move on but come back and complain when you're bringing your kids up on basic amounts.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.