big bill

Keeping_Positive

jimmy_teabags wrote: »

there have sent me no letter of proof that i owe them money, i also sent the letter above redcored delivery and have written the times there have rang me.

i will phone CCCS on monday and see what there say, can there just turn up out of the blue? and take my stuff?

A short answer, NO!

jimmy_teabags

i really worried about this, would i be able to complain to someone about this?

jimmy_teabags

rang cccs this morning, got told to ring them and ask them to prove i own the debt, like i did in the letter!

rang them, it went stright to answer phone!

RAS

Jimmy

Do NOT telephone them again, please. The fact that you have hung on the phone so long has marked you out as a potential suckker.

Contact the trading standards nearest there office, see here

Office of Fair Trading, Contact page: http://www.oft.gov.uk/advice_and_res...ase/legal/cca/

The Information Commissioners Office, Complaints page: http://www.ico.gov.uk/complaints.aspx
(note: I chose to complete and download the .pdf form on Data Protection, which I am also sending to the other offices, with an accompanying letter)

Trading Standards, Central office homepage: http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/
-Please note, you can search by inserting the postcode in the top right hand corner, remember to use the postcode of the DCA rather than your own-

Consumer Credit Association, enquiries page: http://www.ccauk.org/consenquiries.htm

the Financial Ombudsman Service, Contacts page: http://www.financial-ombudsman.org/contact/index.html

Members of parliament list, (as provided by RAS): http://www.parliament.uk/directories/hciolists/clomps.cfm

Whilst you are about it, go to the OFT link and read the rules on debt collection. You are being scammed by this lot.

When you write to TS, include copies of all the letter that you have recieved from this mob, with the details of the date when you wrote to them and the copy of the letter to them

1. They should not force you to ring a premium telephone number
2. They are taking advantege of your ignorance of the law by suggesting they can take action (intended visit - not B***y likely and anyway, the visitor has all the rights of a paperboy).
3. No evidence sent of the debt - and this is in dispute.