We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Say NO To Debt Harrassment
Comments
-
I am just wondering if there are issues with a breach of the DPA here? Any suggestions would be gratfully received as I would like to post a letter tonight. Thanks again.0
-
Total breach of the DPA and just about every other confidentiality rule. I would most definitely add this to the letter and demand an explanation regarding this serious breach of confidentiality, saying that you will take this further, and refer this to the Financial Onbudsman if you are not satisfied with the response. That gives you time to find out more, and hopefully will put the wind up them. No idea if the FOS is the right place, but it's always a good threat! From the DPA - I think you might have a very good case here -
13 Compensation for failure to comply with certain requirements
(1) An individual who suffers damage by reason of any contravention by a data controller of any of the requirements of this Act is entitled to compensation from the data controller for that damage.
(2) An individual who suffers distress by reason of any contravention by a data controller of any of the requirements of this Act is entitled to compensation from the data controller for that distress if—
(a) the individual also suffers damage by reason of the contravention, or
(b) the contravention relates to the processing of personal data for the special purposes.
(3) In proceedings brought against a person by virtue of this section it is a defence to prove that he had taken such care as in all the circumstances was reasonably required to comply with the requirement concerned.0 -
Total breach of the DPA and just about every other confidentiality rule. I would most definitely add this to the letter and demand an explanation regarding this serious breach of confidentiality, saying that you will take this further, and refer this to the Financial Onbudsman if you are not satisfied with the response. That gives you time to find out more, and hopefully will put the wind up them. No idea if the FOS is the right place, but it's always a good threat! From the DPA - I think you might have a very good case here -
13 Compensation for failure to comply with certain requirements
(1) An individual who suffers damage by reason of any contravention by a data controller of any of the requirements of this Act is entitled to compensation from the data controller for that damage.
(2) An individual who suffers distress by reason of any contravention by a data controller of any of the requirements of this Act is entitled to compensation from the data controller for that distress if—
(a) the individual also suffers damage by reason of the contravention, or
(b) the contravention relates to the processing of personal data for the special purposes.
(3) In proceedings brought against a person by virtue of this section it is a defence to prove that he had taken such care as in all the circumstances was reasonably required to comply with the requirement concerned.
:T A sound post in reply to what is a blatant and serious contravention of the law.
Arrange a meeting with your Citizen Advice office and explain what is happening (if solicitors fees are too high) and ask them to write to Egg on your behalf.
If you and the CA both send letters, Egg should then listen.
If they do not, report them to the Office of Fair Trading for contravention of the acts, as previously posted above. But don't mention the OFT to the CA: this is your last resort and your private prerogative.:grouphug:0 -
this is a very good post,not so long ago i was in debts,and a certain cc company were phoning me up all the time,to the point where i felt very very harrased in the end i snapped and said if you phone me again i will contact the police because your harrassing me,anyway,i never got anymore phonecalls after that.It`s getting to the point0
-
this is a very good post,not so long ago i was in debts,and a certain cc company were phoning me up all the time,to the point where i felt very very harrased in the end i snapped and said if you phone me again i will contact the police because your harrassing me,anyway,i never got anymore phonecalls after that.
You have illustrated a very simple way of getting rid of unwelcome callers.:T
In fact, if people inform the debt collection agencies that they only wish to communicate in writing - then they must abide by that request, as long as you have done exactly that and offered a sum that you can afford to pay.
Many moons ago I threatened to sue a company who spoke to me like I was a piece of quano, and I received an apology.
Remember: bullies do not bargain for people standing up for themselves.:p0 -
Iv'e got a great idea to stop unwelcome calls, how about paying the money back?:rotfl:0
-
bank_insider wrote: »Iv'e got a great idea to stop unwelcome calls, how about paying the money back?:rotfl:
Isn't that precisely what has been said here?
You pay back what you can afford - and then the dogs are called off?
We are talking about harrassment: most financial institutions do not harrass - so why should the ones that do get away with it?
It's about being professional and legally circumspect.
You cannot argue with that!
0 -
Thid might come as a surprise, but sometimes circumstances change making repayment at agreed rates difficult! It might be you one day and you won't be so smug.Iv'e got a great idea to stop unwelcome calls, how about paying the money back?0 -
Thid might come as a surprise, but sometimes circumstances change making repayment at agreed rates difficult! It might be you one day and you won't be so smug.
Totally appropriate post:A : but since bankers (no I did not leave out the 'w'
) are often prone to what I would call extortion via their habit of taking money ad lib adsurdum from your account, who are they to pontificate?
Life, I think, is totally ironic, would you not say?! :rolleyes:
That reminds me...I wonder if the banks will be paying back all those billions they have filched from OUR bank accounts?
I wait with anticipation for a well-earned bloody nose coming the banking fraternity's way!0 -
How about you crawl back under the slimy rock from whence you came, and return once you've located the clue that you clearly don't have at the moment...bank_insider wrote: »Iv'e got a great idea to stop unwelcome calls, how about paying the money back?:rotfl:
Facetious comments like yours do nothing to help those who are struggling to cope with debt, often through no fault of their own. If you have nothing useful to contribute, then perhaps you should !!!!!!.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards