We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Station Car Park - APCOA fine

I parked at Tonbridge station in September. I always pay via the APCOA app while on the train into work. I do this daily.

On this particular day the app was not accepting my payment details, I kept getting thrown out at the point of payment. Nothing wrong with the payment card as have been using it before and after this.

I get a fine from APCOA 9 days later.

Is there a chance I can appeal this and win, or let it time out. I believe the laws have been changed and cannot appeal by not naming the driver, or wait for the fine to time out after 6 months.

  • The Law Changed in 2025: As of late December 2025, railway station car parks in England and Wales were reclassified and are now legally treated as "relevant land" under Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act (POFA) 2012.
  • Keeper Liability Now Applies: Because of this legal amendment, parking operators like APCOA can now legally recover unpaid parking charges directly from the registered keeper of the vehicle, regardless of whether you identify the driver. The old loophole of appealing as the keeper and staying silent is officially closed for any tickets issued after this date.
  • The 6-Month Expiry Does Not Apply: By shifting these cases to civil POFA claims, the 6-month time limit for criminal byelaw prosecution no longer applies. It is now treated as a civil contract debt, which carries a 6-year limitation period.

Comments

  • Gr1pr
    Gr1pr Posts: 16,502
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 9 October at 3:45PM

    Definitely Not a fine, read it again

    It doesn't time out after 6 months, but is statute barred after 6 years ( Limitations Act 1980. )

    It should be a private Parking Charge Notice ( PCN. ) from Apcoa , an invoice

    Check if it FULLY COMPLIES with POFA 2012 or not, timescales and wording

    It definitely CAN be appealed by the Registered Keeper

  • cooldude255220
    cooldude255220 Posts: 2,032
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite

    Without seeing the the PCN we cannot comment on any potential POFA arguments.

    But you could try this:

    It is understood that APCOA's authority to operate at Tonbridge Station is governed by its agreement with London & South Eastern Railway Limited (agreement number BSS03.1090) ("the agreement").

    Page 103 of the agreement specifies that "Tonbridge" is one of the sites in the List of Sites (Schedule 6) to which the agreement applies.

    Page 39 of the Agreement states:

    2.3. Patrollers shall, on their patrol … 2.3.3. issue Penalty Notices in accordance with Bye Laws;

    Page 53 of the Agreement states:
    2.1. The Supplier’s Patrollers shall issue Penalty Notices (PN) for infringements in accordance with the Railway Byelaws.

    Page 7 defines "Penalty Notice/PN" as meaning "a document placed on a vehicle, or sent by post to the registered keeper or hirer of a vehicle, requiring payment of a penalty, the liability for which has arisen due to a breach of the Byelaws".

    This definition is clear: a penalty notice must arise from a breach of the Byelaws.

    For the avoidance of doubt, the agreement does not permit APCOA to issue Parking Charge Notices for contractual breaches which do not arise from a breach of the byelaws.

    APCOA have however issued a Parking Charge Notice, which alleges a "breach of the terms and conditions of use".

    APCOA have no authority to issue Parking Charge Notices on the land in question. The PCN is therefore ultra vires and therefore this appeal must be allowed.

★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.