We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Apcoa PCN Railway Station

So long story short, my wife and i parked at a railway station, and paid. A week or so later a PCN came through in the post. I was selling my car so had removed the private plate from it, but out of autopilot had paid for parking on the private plate.

I assumed send details of valid payment to Apcoa and all sorted. Apparantly not.

They sent me an appeal rejection letter today with £20 offer and a popla code. Do i fight this or just pay the £20 and be done with it

Comments

  • Gr1pr
    Gr1pr Posts: 16,601
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 25 August at 11:56AM

    If you were to draft a popla appeal, what legal arguments would you use that might win at popla. ?

    Apcoa believe that you choosing the wrong VRM is a major keying error and so they believe that the pcn was correctly issued ! The BPA Code of Practice lets them offer the £20 option

    Are you willing to fight your corner in court if they issue a court claim against you within the next 6 years (via Oak Legal)

  • sjtw119
    sjtw119 Posts: 10
    Second Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Forumite

    To be honest thats really the question I am asking. I paid for parking, they are whole, but they are trying to squeeze additional revenue for what amounts to a keying error. Is this something POPLA will uphold or is there an argument that will work here?

  • Gr1pr
    Gr1pr Posts: 16,601
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 25 August at 7:14PM

    Popla won't accept mitigating factors, plus Apcoa offered the £20 option too, so if you decide to fight then it MAY end up in a court claim with around £212 at stake, so be sure about your stance, because its either pay or run the risk of a possibly larger amount

    Apcoa are perfectly aware of the fact that you paid a parking fee, but you breached the parking contract, because you paid for a number plate that wasn't there, meaning that there is no record of payment against the number plate on the car park that was on your vehicle, so it wasn't authorised by way of correct identification

    Currently, Oak legal are pursuing unpaid Invoices for Apcoa, so who knows what Apcoa will do, certainly not us ( since the law changed on Boxing Day last year )

  • cooldude255220
    cooldude255220 Posts: 2,039
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite

    Which railway station, out of interest?

  • sjtw119
    sjtw119 Posts: 10
    Second Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Forumite

    OK Thanks, i think ill just suck it up and pay this one, it just really grates that they can get away with this stuff.

  • Le_Kirk
    Le_Kirk Posts: 27,284
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite

    Apcoa are perfectly aware of the fact that you paid a parking fee, but you breached the parking contract, because you paid for a number plate that wasn't there, meaning that there is no record of payment against the number plate on the car park that was on your vehicle, so it wasn't authorised by way of correct identification

    Of course one could always cite contributory negligence on the part of the parking company; they knew the VRM you stated wasn't in the car park (via ANPR) but still allowed you to pay for it!

  • Gr1pr
    Gr1pr Posts: 16,601
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 26 August at 1:37PM

    I agree, but that is an unlikely win at popla, because you paid the TOC for the parking, not Apcoa, but Apcoa had a contract with the driver to correctly follow the rules on behalf of the TOC, or a pcn would be incurred, but a defendant possibly might win in a future court claim, which is why I said its either pay, or fight ( some people are risk averse )

  • James_Poisson
    James_Poisson Posts: 1,019
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite

    You won't win at POPLA and although you paid, the landowner received that money not APCOA they have imposed a £20 admin fee to cover their costs simply due to your error.

    Looks like you admitted being the driver so that avenue is closed, if APCOA are breaking their habit of a lifetime and are starting small claims is it worth going down that route for £20 maybe not, it's your choice.

★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.