We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Red-light camera offence – unclear stop-line evidence and white van nearby

2»

Comments

  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 23,322 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 12 August at 3:56PM

    1.3 sec is £100 and 3 points or a course. Although it is also an offence to cross on amber that is never enforced and there is offen n a 1 sec into the red discretionary time as well, so white van man probably got away with it and it is unlikely that his (or her) van would have triggered the camera as it crossed the line.

  • daveyjp
    daveyjp Posts: 14,446 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper

    Looks to me its the van which has run the red, not the blue car.

  • LoneStarState
    LoneStarState Posts: 218 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 12 August at 5:48PM

    I would strongly recommend you take this over to the FTLA forum and post within the speeding/criminal offence sub forum as previously given by an earlier poster.

    Speeding and other criminal offences

    A crude analysis of comparing overlaps of the two images shows no movement in your car as far as I can tell. The tyres are behind the stop line again based on crude line measurement on the second photo. It could be that your bumper may overhang the stop line…….how that can be determined beyond a reasonable doubt I'm not sure. This is obviously based on your images. I assume the images they hold are higher quality.

    Unfortunately you likely won't see full evidence until court. Take it to FTLA linked above and see what they say.

    As mentioned it could be a mess up on their part and the van was meant to be pursued for the offence.

  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 23,322 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    You only have to cross the stop line by a fraction of an inch to to commit a red light offence, that image was taken 1.3 seconds after the light turned red so the van crossed it some time before that point and may or may not have got a NIP.

    You can’t tell from the photo that the OP crossed the line butis very close to it and the sensor in the road will confirm it.

  • HillStreetBlues
    HillStreetBlues Posts: 7,029 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Homepage Hero Photogenic
    edited 12 August at 7:51PM

    Thought I would have an AI test FWIW
    1st pic AI claims not crossed the line, 2nd pic it has crossed the white line.
    EDIT AI also states red car hasn't crossed the white line

    Let's Be Careful Out There
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.9K Life & Family
  • 263.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.