We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Claiming UC every other 6 months?
Hi all.
If someone was to claim UC for 6 months, then sign off because they found a temporary job that lasted 6 months, sign on again after it ended, sign off for another 6 (due to another temp. job that became available), and repeat the cycle, would that actually be possible?
I guess that could be an infinite process if I'm correct.
Thanks.
Comments
-
There is no signing off on UC - the claim stays open and the amount of UC you receive each month varies depending on your earnings that month. If you earn too much, UC drops to zero but the claim stays open.
The claim only closes if you have no UC award for 6 months due to earning too much, then the claim closes. But you are free to make a new claim at any time if your earnings drop or your circumstances change.
I am a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Benefits & tax credits, Heat pumps and Green & Ethical MoneySaving forums. If you need any help on those boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any post you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own & not the official line of Money Saving Expert.2 -
But I thought you had to re-apply for UC if you found a job, say for 6 months, because that's how much time is needed to make a fresh claim?
0 -
No, if you start work you report a change on your UC claim and the claim stays open, with the amount of UC paid depending on your earnings. If you are earning too much then the UC award will be £0 each month.
If the UC award is £0 for six months running, then the claim closes. If it has closed and your earnings fall or that job ends, then you make a new claim for UC and start again.
I am a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Benefits & tax credits, Heat pumps and Green & Ethical MoneySaving forums. If you need any help on those boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any post you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own & not the official line of Money Saving Expert.3 -
I would imagine the chances of being employed and then unemployed in regular six months cycles is extremely remote.
All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have not could of.2 -
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6672209/can-you-claim-job-seekers-allowance-every-other-6-months#latest
Life in the slow lane2 -
That's talking about new style JSA though - not UC
1 -
Except seasonal work, of which there is plenty in tourist areas. OTOH, I'd expect a person to be looking for other fill-in roles even if determined to be available for that role in the same 6 months next year.
Decluttering awards 2025: 🏅🏅🏅🏅⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️, DH: 🏅🏅⭐️, DD1: 🏅 and one for Mum: 🏅1 -
And so would DWP if thry are being asked to pay UC (or new style JSA)…..
0 -
Some do earn enough in a 6 month period , that they choose not to work for the other 6 months.
But the local Job Centre will be requiring active job seeking, if someone thought they could claim for the inactive 6 month period. And for the first 13 weeks of a new claim, weekly appointments will be required and from week 14 fortnightly appointments. If someone is not putting in any effort to find work a decision maker could decide to apply a sanction.
The comments I post are personal opinion. Always refer to official information sources before relying on internet forums. If you have a problem with any organisation, enter into their official complaints process at the earliest opportunity, as sometimes complaints have to be started within a certain time frame.2 -
DWP are also likely to look at averaging the earnings out a 12 month period if its an ongoing thing.
Why would someone think its ok to do this?
"You've been reading SOS when it's just your clock reading 5:05 "0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.1K Spending & Discounts
- 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


