We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Rent-a-room scheme if you are renting :-)
Hi.
If someone is renting a property, can they then rent out one of the spare bedrooms under the RaR scheme, if it's ok with the owner?
Ta.
Comments
-
Short answer: yes.
The Govt says you can can opt in to the scheme at any time if you’re a resident landlord, whether or not you own your home.
'Resident landlord' means you must live there yourself and share some facilities with your tenant(s). The scheme does not apply to accommodation converted into separate self-contained flats.
2 -
Thank you - that's promising.
0 -
yes, from the tax perspective, you can claim RAR if you are a resident tenant
but as you rightly say, your own LL may not permit it, so you need their permission.
and of course that does make you a LL in your own right but as the other person is your lodger that does water down many of the LL compliances you would otherwise need to follow:
- you do not need to protect any deposit you take
- you can evict with "reasonable" notice (eg. same day depending on actual circumstances)
- but you are still required to provide a safe environment, including, if applicable, the annual gas safety check2 -
Thank you. Yes, the current tenant is resident and on the CT register.
0 -
Is that not called subletting, most tenancies have clauses about this as well as all over 18 living in the properties must be declared to the landlord.
I would suspect you need the landlords consent but whether or not they can legally refuse these days who knows. I hope it's the case they can refuse this kind of setup.
As a landlord we would refuse the request but then if it was done under the radar we might never know.
0 -
It's allowed if the landlord is aware and gives permission however I'm not sure of the then legal status of the lodger; would they become a "permitted occupier"?
0 -
No. Legally, a permitted occupier is completely different from a lodger.
Perhaps you are thinking of the term "excluded occupier" which can be applied to a lodger?
0 -
there is zero legal position between ultimate LL and the tenant's lodger
the contractual relationship is between tenant and lodger and therefore you are correct that the lodger would be a permitted occupier in relation to the LL if the LL has given permission to their T of course (if not then ultimately they would be a trespasser)
Therefore, the LL can only take legal action against his own tenant and must leave the tenant to sanction their lodger. Hence it most certainly is in the interests of the LL to ensure that any permission given by them to their tenant is clealry communicated and the tenant understands their responsibility (and exposure) if the LL must take action against the T due to actions of the lodger.1 -
I can see this being abused by couples on benefits. Suggest they have split up and one rents a room.
Interesting and maybe it is already happening without LL's knowing a thing about it.
1 -
DWP keeps an eye open for this sort of fraud. It isn't very difficult to match names to the same address and start asking questions.
Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
Erik Aronesty, 2014
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456K Spending & Discounts
- 248.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.9K Life & Family
- 263.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
