We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

ISA/ SIPP split

Hello

Each month I contibute to my SIPP, as well as a Stocks and Shares ISA. I am a higher rate tax payer.

My SIPP provider claims 20% tax relief and I claim the other 20% from HMRC.

I currently have a contribution split of 55% ISA and 45% SIPP.

I claim child benefit. In order to avoid High Income Child Benefit Charge, I keep my Net Adjusted Income below £60,000.

My salary has increased. In order to keep my Net Adjusted Income Below £60,000 I need to increase my SIPP contributions.

This would take me to a 45% ISA and 55% SIPP.

I am deciding if this is okay, or at what point I feel the SIPP split is too high.

The alternative would be to pay some High Income Child Benefit Charge and contribute more to my ISA.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Comments

  • NoMore
    NoMore Posts: 2,046
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite

    Very difficult to comment without your age, your planned retirement age, your planned retirement income, the actual balances of your ISA/Pensions. Any other savings/Pensions that might affect the decision.

    For most people retiring at 'normal' age (60+) you would expect their Pension pots to be a lot bigger than their ISA's but this is a generalisation and it's really down to people's individual circumstances and desires.

  • robaber
    robaber Posts: 61
    Seventh Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite

    Thank you.

    I am 41. I plan to retire at 68.

    My ISA is at 25k. My SIPP is at 5k.

    I also have a Workplace Defined Benefit pension. Which will be 38k a year.

  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 32,802
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 1 June at 5:49PM

    Your DB workplace pension ( public sector ?) is so many many times more valuable than your ISA or SIPP, that the split between the latter is probably not that important.

  • robaber
    robaber Posts: 61
    Seventh Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite

    Thanks.

    Yes, public sector.

    Perhaps I will allow the split to drift to my SIPP, while I am claiming child benefit and then shift back to 50/50, when child benefit stops.

  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 30,832
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite

    I suppose the risk is you end up being a higher rate taxpayer in retirement, but in that case you're still better off overall as you've retained the child benefit.

    "Perhaps I will allow the split to drift to my SIPP, while I am claiming child benefit and then shift back to 50/50, when child benefit stops."

    This seems very sensible. Who knows, maybe one day we'll get an overhaul to the tax system to get rid of some of these cliff-edges.

★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 606K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.