We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Redrow won’t submit a Section 38 to the council, so they can continue charging maintenance fees

24

Comments

  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 27,041 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    You seem convinced that Redrow benefits financially, but you haven't explained how that works.

    FirstPort are a very large business that does the management for lots of estates around the country. Are you seriously suggesting they give Redrow a back-hander? That would be scandalous, if it were true. Do you have even a shred of evidence?

    Could I suggest that you try to form a residents association that offers to take over the management.

    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • Section62
    Section62 Posts: 11,143 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper

    Their reply was: “In this case, the Section 38 Agreement, which would allow the private streets to be adopted by the Highway Authority, was not completed. As a result, the roads remain private and cannot be adopted unless the developer chooses to progress an adoption agreement and can demonstrate that the streets have been constructed fully to adoptable standards. Redrow has previously confirmed that it does not wish to pursue adoption and intends for the streets within [retracted] to remain private.

    “Given this position, any concerns relating to areas outside the existing limits of adoption should be directed to the landowner or the appointed management company. This includes requests for the roads to be adopted, as adoption can only proceed where the landowner voluntarily enters into a Section 38 Agreement.

    I don’t take everything the council says at face value — an independent councillor told me they are generally hostile to adopting new developments —

    The councillor is probably right, although I'd probably say "disinclined" rather than "hostile". There's not much to gain for a highway authority adopting streets, and ongoing hassle and complaints to deal with if they do. The main driver though is developers wanting to build the roads on the cheap using minimal land, in order they can increase the dwellings per hectate and keep the planning department happy in meeting their new homes target.

    You are right not to take everything the council says at face value. The two bits I've bolded above are both wrong.

    A S38 agreement is one way in which a road can be adopted, but there are others. Including in circumstances where the current owner doesn't want the road/street adopted, or for that matter where there is no known owner.

    So "cannot be adopted" and "adoption can only proceed where…" are only true where the S38 process is being used, and thus are not the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

    In practice the council is unlikely to adopt other than via the S38 route, as the alternatives don't really allow the highway authority to charge the developer the costs of bringing the road up to an adoptable standard, nor to chuck in some extra money (e.g. via S106) to sweeten the deal.

  • webmasterpolo
    webmasterpolo Posts: 712 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    We have started ourselves a steering committee in advance of getting control of the estate management company to try and improve the services of First Port and push Vistry to get on with the adoption. It's been over a year and nothing much has happened. The majority of correspondence we send Vistry and First port is ignored. Even though as an estate we pay Firstport over £25k a year.

    Sense is not common.
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 27,041 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    It's absolutely no help for you in your present home, but next time you buy somewhere make sure the owners of the houses are in charge of maintenance.

    It's worth noting that the grass and playgrounds are only part of the issue. At some stage the roads themselves will at least need resurfacing, and that's really expensive.

    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • anselld
    anselld Posts: 8,749 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 20 April at 6:05AM

    Redrow benefits if only be not meeting the cost of any adoption agreement with the Council, s106 etc and associated admin costs.

  • RelievedSheff
    RelievedSheff Posts: 12,977 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic

    Even if the roads are adopted you will still have a service charge for the green spaces and playground. The council won't adopt those.

    Check Your paperwork as to whether the roads and drainage are planned to be adopted, there will be clauses in the land transfer document if they are.

  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 27,041 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    Indeed, Redrow may not have built the roads to adoptable standards. But, that should have been determined by the OP before deciding whether to buy the property. That’s very different from a conspiracy, as the OP suggests.

    As long as buyers fail to do proper due diligence before buying new property, the developers will continue to skimp on infrastructure.

    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • daveyjp
    daveyjp Posts: 14,192 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 20 April at 9:11AM

    I understand one reason one of my local council's has a general policy all residential streets are to be adopted is because the area has a large number of unadopted streets - many Victorian/Edwardian - and they are now in such a state of disrepair there is pressure from residents to Councillors to do something.

    Limited funding is available, but some streets are being upgraded to prevent damage to properties.


    OP check the planning documents and see what the planning report and decision notice says about the road adoption.

  • RelievedSheff
    RelievedSheff Posts: 12,977 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic

    Do you have a clause similar to this in your land transfer document:

    Screenshot 2026-04-20 093904.jpg

    If you do then they do intend to have the highways and drainage adopted.

    The roads on our estate are not adopted yet, the house we have just bought is 7.5 years old. But the developer will get them adopted eventually and we are indemnified against any costs associated with gaining the adoptions.

  • Section62
    Section62 Posts: 11,143 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper

    If you do then they do intend to have the highways and drainage adopted.

    Clause 12.9.3 is just a generic provision - by itself it doesn't commit the developer to do anything (with the roads). There would need to be a schedule or plan showing the extent of the "Adoptable Roads" for it to be enforceable.

    The use of the word "any" indicates it is possible there are none.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.