We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Air Canada claim - how strong is my case?

leadlion
leadlion Posts: 18 Forumite
Ninth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
edited Today at 1:45PM in Flight delay compensation

I recently had an Air Canada flight booked from Lima to London via Montreal. Shortly before it was due to depart, the first flight (to Montreal) was delayed and I subsequently got rerouted on a later itinerary via Madrid. I arrived at Heathrow over 13 hours late.

At the time of the initial delay and just before the automatic reroute, I received an official email from Air Canada stating the reason was because ‘a mechanical issue on an earlier flight caused the scheduled aircraft to arrive late.’

Given that the cause was mechanical and because I was rerouted through an EU hub (therefore one leg of the journey completely within the EU/UK), I understood that EU/GB264 legislation would take effect.

I opened a claim with Air Canada but they got back to me saying that after reviewing my case they had determined that the cause of the delay was weather related and therefore I would not be entitled to compensation.

Clearly it cannot be both mechanical and weather related – it has to be one of them. I emailed back with documentation of the original cause attached but it has been well over a month and I have heard nothing. In the last week I sent a follow up email but am still waiting.

Before I take this further I wanted to ask if I have a strong claim here – and if so how do I proceed to escalating it?

Comments

  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 40,491 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    Neither the UK nor the EU regulations apply, because their applicability is based on the end points of the journey, i.e. connecting via the EU en route between two non-EU locations doesn't bring them into play - the relevant case law is Airhelp Limited v Austrian Airlines AG (Case C-451/20).

    It may be that you have other rights under Air Canada's own policies, or any national options available to those departing from Peru.

  • leadlion
    leadlion Posts: 18 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    edited Today at 2:17PM

    OK, I guess I would then chase AirCanada - but how worth it is it? They’ve muddied the waters with their contradicting claim and I guess if they’re not being externally enforced to pay any compensation they can make up anything they want.

  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 40,491 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    They'd need to comply with their published policies so you'd be best advised to read up on their conditions of carriage, in order to ascertain what their stated obligations (if any) are. It may also be that there are Canadian aviation regulations that offer passenger rights here.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.