We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Fundsmith again.

1234568

Comments

  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,651 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!

    I agree. One should buy something like fundsmith because one wants the style, not because one believes the manager has some ability to predict future markets. If the style changes the justification for holding tthe fund disappears.

  • talexuser
    talexuser Posts: 3,639 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    I think if you want to go active just to avoid the mag7 magnification in passive there are better funds than Fundsmiths' underperformance.

  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,651 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    edited 14 July at 4:24PM

    That is where the interests of the find manager and the investor diverge. The fund manager wants something they can sell, investors want funds that meet their individual needs. Whether the change actually improves performance is irrelevent and is not under the control of the fund manager. In my vciew if the fund no longer has the characteristics the investor wants then they should not buy it.

  • aroominyork
    aroominyork Posts: 4,137 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 14 July at 5:26PM

    I think you are too purist. The manager and investor both want good performance. If the manager thinks his style is not suited to the current market, there is no reason to stick to a failing strategy because some investors want no compromise in style. Ask a group of Fundsmith investors whether they would rather Smith adapts his style because he sees it as necessary or sticks to a style he thinks will continue to underperform; I know how the majority would reply.

  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 30,695 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 14 July at 5:52PM

    There was quite a big marketing machine behind the fund, and lots of publicity, so it became a darling of the novice investor. The average punter is probably not wedded to the background investment philosophy and just bought it because they thought it would do well. Clearly investors have been leaving in droves and will continue to do so until things turn around. Terry cannot run a fund properly with an ever diminishing pool of capital.

    Whereas ETFs like iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor and VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat are probably quite a bit more sticky, as you invest in those because you believe in the portfolio composition.

  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,651 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!

    I thiink that if Smith's investors believe that he could devise a different strategy that will provide more consistent higher returns into the future other than by pure chance they are deluded. If there was such a strategy surely someone would have come up with it by now after perhaps 300 years of stock trading. Investors should stop trying to see patterns in what is essentially random data.

  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,651 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!

    I agree that Terry Smith and his colleagues need to convince potential customers that the good times will return. Whether that is of any benefit to the customers is arguable.

    Such tilt funds as Wide Moat or Quality may well have useful benefits to investors, but what they dont appear to do is to give higher returns than say a straight index fund. My argument purely relates to the aim of maximising returns, especially over the shorter to medium term. If you have some other objectives that would be a very different matter.

  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 30,695 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    No disagreement here. I mentioned those two only as they are broadly aligned with the same investment philosophy, and would more likely be chosen purposefully.

  • aldershot
    aldershot Posts: 212 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts

    I've been in Fundsmith in a major way since 2013. I started investing when the big figure was 1, so it has, in aggregate, given me a perectly reasonable performance. I liked the philosophy of long term holding. I've been concerned that equities in general, and the US in particular, have looked increasingly unstable. Terry's letter was the catalyst to do something and I'm now out of the fund. Abandoning half the portfolio just looked desperate and at my age, 10 year gilts yeilding close to 5% look increasingly attractive. It's been a good ride, but time to step out.

  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 30,695 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.