We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
UKPC DCB Legal - yet another LBC
Comments
-
Correct, Ignore them
3 -
Ok thanks.
0 -
New letter today telling me unless i pay now the case will passed on the GCTT certificated enforcement agents, they sound lethal LOL
0 -
They Are also ZZPS in disguise, Ignore them
5 -
They're more like certified silly peope who need to see the psych doctor, imo.
4 -
We don't need to see £170 threatograms.
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD3 -
-
You can see it is the LBC from the heading, and as you've had the whole Summer to read post 2 of the NEWBIES thread about this stage, you'll already know how to respond and what happens after that.
🙂
P.S. please edit your thread title to:
UKPC DCB Legal - yet another LBC
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Thread title edited.
So i used the generic template from post2. Sorry im a bit thick lol am right in sending this to DCB legal and not UK parking control Limited. i added my reasons for refusal down the bottom any suggestions ?
Dear Sirs,
Your ref:
Proposed legal proceedings
Claimant:UK Parking Control Limited
I refer to your letter of claim.
I confirm that my address for service for the time being is as follows,
and any older address must be erased from your records: MY address
You should revert to your client because the 'propensity to pay' score in
my case is zero, so any claim is hopeless and a waste of the court
fee (whether 'fronted' by your firm or not). Move on to weaker
victims.
The alleged 'debt' is disputed and any court proceedings will be
vigorously defended. As the blue badge was clearly displayed on the vehicle dash, vehicle encroached on to hatched marking to ensure no damage would of been caused to both vehicles parked the as the user next to said vehicle had parked improper as his drivers side door would of hit passenger side door of apellents vehicle.
Yours
faithfully,0 -
It needs grammar edits because there's no such phrase as 'would of' or 'parked improper ' and it's not dash but 'dashboard'.
Also do NOT admit to encroaching.
You'd be better just saying I was parked in a disabled bay. The hatchings are part of those bays, made wider to assist ease of access. Here's a copy of my blue badge, your client is already aware that I was entitled to use that bay but they failed to make any reasonable adjustments for me.
That's a breach of the Equality Act 2010 and I'm not paying, so your proposed claim will end up in the discontinuations bin as ever. Don't waste your £35.
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.1K Spending & Discounts
- 248.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards




