We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

New cash ISA limit for those turning 65 during the tax year

2

Comments

  • sje_111
    sje_111 Posts: 18 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker

    I was surprised that Martin Lewis would suggest to the government to apply the 2027 reduction in cash ISA limit only to those under 65

    Why would he suggest something that will quite likely discourage people from saving

    Many people are not keen on using stocks and shares ISA products - I don't think this is a good move

  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 29,829 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 8 April at 5:58AM

    Most people aren't paid enough to be able to save more than £1,000 per month (that figure representing around 50% of the UK median take home pay). They'll be able to continue using cash ISAs for savings up to that level.

    Those lucky enough to earn more can get a better net return using regular savers paying 6%+ alongside cash ISAs. There are also premium bonds for higher rate taxpayers.

  • Malchester
    Malchester Posts: 1,106 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    When you reach retirement, from personal experience, your risk level with savings is greater than before retirement. With the 5 to 10 year timescales for investments retirees, like me, are less likely to want to invest in a stocks and shares ISA so not applying the new regulations to people 65 and over seems sensible.

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,406 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    Generally, most people may drop a notch or two with investment risk when getting to retirement. A good proportion continue just as before because they still have 20-30 years to live and moving to cash could actually increase their risks, not reduce them.

    The selection of age 65 seems a bit weird. 65 is irrelevant to most people. Its not the state pension age for example. It smacks of someone being very out of touch or in receipt of a civil service pension with a scheme retirement age thinking that is normal for everyone.

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 41,010 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    What gave you the impression that the government was encouraged to tweak the ISA regime by Martin Lewis? Even if he did suggest what you're implying, it would presumably be from the angle of highlighting the increased importance of saving (rather than investing) for the older cohort, i.e. on the basis that the cash ISA limit was going to be reduced anyway, it's justifying a carve-out for those over 65.

  • Sahara20
    Sahara20 Posts: 32 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts

    Has there been any new information as to whether the new cash ISA increases from £12,000 to £20,000 as soon as you turn 65 (whenever that is within the tax year) or if you have to wait until the next tax year to take advantage of the increased allowance?

  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 29,829 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
  • Sahara20
    Sahara20 Posts: 32 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts

    OK. Thank you.

  • Rich2808
    Rich2808 Posts: 1,527 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 16 May at 11:40AM

    Looks like we will have a new PM and Chancellor by late September - so maybe these changes will never come in at all. Although they could of course make them even more punitive if as expected the government moves to the left.

    This is Rachel Reeves policy - her successor's as set out in the autumn budget - might be different.

  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 29,829 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 16 May at 11:44AM

    It might have needed to be kicked down the road anyway. With no clear agreement in sight on the details, banks are unlikely to have time to implement the new rules in time for April once they are settled. With all the upheaval, this probably won't get a great deal of attention in the coming weeks.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.