We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Let's discuss... corporate bonds

13»

Comments

  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 28,747 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Linton said:
    Dead_keen said:
    Linton said:
    Dead_keen said:

    I am somewhat bemused by the concept of “older staler” bonds. Can you explain? Surely a bond continues paying the specified interest unless the issuer goes bust at which point the bond becomes valueless.
    Have a look at this from April 2025: https://www.ft.com/content/ef86ccae-bcbf-4975-bb23-d1a39b7523df



    Paywall                                    
    You just need to register. It is free.
    Thanks - the article is talking about trading corporate bonds, which seems to be easier in the US than the UK, and that some of those bonds are rarely traded and so don't change in price.  Therefore they are of no interest to traders. However they would still be generating the same interest they always did. Trading corporate bonds for profit is a very different scenario than using corporate bonds for income.  
    A fund that is suffering net outflows would need to redeem holdings in order to repay exiting investors. You do tend to see that liquidity filters get applied to bond indexes, and active managers are probably wary of loading up on illiquid bonds.
  • DavidT67
    DavidT67 Posts: 643 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Platforms such as WiseAlpha do exist which allow retail investors access to corporate bonds and offer fractional interests.  
  • Dead_keen
    Dead_keen Posts: 307 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    masonic said:
    Linton said:
    Dead_keen said:
    Linton said:
    Dead_keen said:

    I am somewhat bemused by the concept of “older staler” bonds. Can you explain? Surely a bond continues paying the specified interest unless the issuer goes bust at which point the bond becomes valueless.
    Have a look at this from April 2025: https://www.ft.com/content/ef86ccae-bcbf-4975-bb23-d1a39b7523df



    Paywall                                    
    You just need to register. It is free.
    Thanks - the article is talking about trading corporate bonds, which seems to be easier in the US than the UK, and that some of those bonds are rarely traded and so don't change in price.  Therefore they are of no interest to traders. However they would still be generating the same interest they always did. Trading corporate bonds for profit is a very different scenario than using corporate bonds for income.  
    A fund that is suffering net outflows would need to redeem holdings in order to repay exiting investors. 
    Exactly.  An open-ended corporate bond fund may find that lots of investors want cash and so effectively be a forced seller of things that are pretty illiquid / have large spreads.  
  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 28,747 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 1 January at 1:32PM
    Dead_keen said:
    masonic said:
    Linton said:
    Dead_keen said:
    Linton said:
    Dead_keen said:

    I am somewhat bemused by the concept of “older staler” bonds. Can you explain? Surely a bond continues paying the specified interest unless the issuer goes bust at which point the bond becomes valueless.
    Have a look at this from April 2025: https://www.ft.com/content/ef86ccae-bcbf-4975-bb23-d1a39b7523df



    Paywall                                    
    You just need to register. It is free.
    Thanks - the article is talking about trading corporate bonds, which seems to be easier in the US than the UK, and that some of those bonds are rarely traded and so don't change in price.  Therefore they are of no interest to traders. However they would still be generating the same interest they always did. Trading corporate bonds for profit is a very different scenario than using corporate bonds for income.  
    A fund that is suffering net outflows would need to redeem holdings in order to repay exiting investors. 
    Exactly.  An open-ended corporate bond fund may find that lots of investors want cash and so effectively be a forced seller of things that are pretty illiquid / have large spreads.  
    Which affects those wishing to sell as they redeem at a depressed unit price or find the fund is gated. I've not heard of significant bond funds getting into liquidity issues (unlike property or a certain infamous "equity income" fund), but a depressed unit price provides a good entry point to a new investor, and is irrelevant to the long term investor. There are a few funds in the Investment Trust universe that are better suited to the illiquid side of the bond market. The fixed pool of capital avoids the vehicle being a forced seller and punishes those running for the hills and rewards contrarians through a large discount to NAV.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.9K Life & Family
  • 260.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.