We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Received a SJPN today out of nowhere and unsure of how to proceed.

12346»

Comments

  • Okell
    Okell Posts: 3,702 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 24 February at 10:53PM

    "… then they ain't too bright then are they."

    They aren't. That's why you need to keep it simple.

    Couple of points:

    First, if there was no "Mitigation" section then you probably did do your best with the speeding offence to say as you did. ie "I am willing to plead guilty to this offence if, and only if, the charge for the second offence of failing to provide information is dropped."

    [Edit: But see my postscript edit at the end of this post. I'm not actually sure that was an acceptable plea to the speeding offence]

    But I would have left it at that and not added "I outline the reason for this in my reply to the second offence etc…"

    Second, looking at your two earlier posts on 19 Feb at 9:45pm and 20 Feb at 6:41pm, you basically seem to have failed to plead either Guilty or Not Guilty to the failure to ID the driver - you simply said you didn't get the correspondence.

    When you make a plea in criminal proceedings, your plea has to be unequivocal. By not explicitly pleading Not Guilty to the second offence you have made your plea equivocal because it's not clear what you mean,

    I suspect that's why the court hasn;t accepted it and wants you to appear to explain what you do mean

    [Edit: In fact looking at those two replies again, you didn't clearly plead Not Guilty even to the speeding offence! Instead you waffled that you'd be willing to plead guilty if etc etc. You didn't actually make an unequivocal plea to either charge]

  • Okell
    Okell Posts: 3,702 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 24 February at 11:30PM

    @PirateAndy - just to clarify my earlier post from 9:39pm this evening, it doesn't look as if you entered a clear unequivocal plea to either charge.

    I think you should have:

    1 Speeding charge - "Not Guity" (But I would be willing to change my plea to guilty if and only if the fail to identify charge is dropped)

    2 Fail to identify charge - "Not Guilty"

    That's it

  • TooManyPoints
    TooManyPoints Posts: 1,755 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 25 February at 4:40PM

    So if I "confused" court staff… then they ain't too bright then are they.

    As I explained, they have not been legally trained and most of them do not understand some of the nuances involved in the criminal legal processes. Their job is administrative, not judicial.

    That’s why I recommended that you kept your response as brief as possible. I also explained why you should – so as to avoid the very problem you have now encountered.

    It makes no odds anyway. What’s done is done and all you need to do is to make sure your pleas are understood when you attend court.

  • PirateAndy
    PirateAndy Posts: 47 Forumite
    10 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic

    The online plea portal had a ticky box. Click guilty or not guilty to each charge. It was unequivocal. I clicked the not guilty boxes to both charges.

    Then the next page asked for reasons for the not guilty pleas. I gave them.

    So I don't know how much more bloody unequivocal you'd like me to have been. Did I need to provide a psychic signal of my intent as well? Perhaps sent the pleas in Semaphore? Perhaps you would've liked them in Morse-!!!!!!-code?

  • PirateAndy
    PirateAndy Posts: 47 Forumite
    10 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic

    I did though. I could not have been less feckin' detailed, unless I wrote sweet !!!!!! all down. Is there something about my writing that just doesn't seem to be getting through to anyone here?

    I DID WHAT WAS !!!!!! WELL ADVISED.

    I WAS CLEAR.

    I WAS SUCCINCT.

    I SAID NOT GUILTY TO BOTH AND THEN I WAS WILLING TO PLEAD GUILTY TO SPEEDING IF THE FTP WAS DROPPED BECAUSE I HAD NOT RECEIVED THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS IN THE POST.

    WHAT THE !!!!!! DOESN'T COMPUTE HERE!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!!?!?!

  • Okell
    Okell Posts: 3,702 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper

    Pity you couldn't explain that properly the first time round.

  • PirateAndy
    PirateAndy Posts: 47 Forumite
    10 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic

    Pity you talked as if you already knew the process and how it worked so it seemed as if it wasn't needed to be explained.

    If there is a next time I'll make it a point to explain things to everyone like they are 5.

  • PirateAndy
    PirateAndy Posts: 47 Forumite
    10 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic

    Perhaps instead of providing advice that's then used to form the plea… then telling me it's my fault for using that very advice which resulted in the outcome I outlined… then providing little to any other commentary other than "Well it's your fault for saying what you said" AFTER writing it based on the advice provided. All the while blithering for half the conversation to the other fella about this, that and the other.

    You might get frustrated too.

    But it's fine I have what I need. I'll go to court and clarify my already clear points again. Then get let off with the original fine amount and 3 points.

    Then I'll come back and give a bit !!!!!! you to you n'all.

  • LightFlare
    LightFlare Posts: 1,790 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 4 March at 8:53AM

    I’m pretty positive that you won’t be escaping with no points and no fine

    The likely result (if you play it right) will be 3 and a fine

    Without the advice given, you would almost certainly have been in receipt of 6 points and possibly 9 if you really messed up

    I get the frustration, but people have genuinely tried to (and succeeded) in helping and have definitely saved you some points and £

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.