We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Rental debt, legal advice.
Comments
-
If he has 'never missed a payment', how are there £1.6k rent arrears?Marcus3344 said:My son has a joint debt if £1600 with his ex partner.
To cut a long story short, he’s never missed a payment even though not living there for 9 months.
however he is very well aware he is liable for the debt due to joint tenancy.0 -
Because his OH wasn't paying her share.freesha said:
If he has 'never missed a payment', how are there £1.6k rent arrears?Marcus3344 said:My son has a joint debt if £1600 with his ex partner.
To cut a long story short, he’s never missed a payment even though not living there for 9 months.
however he is very well aware he is liable for the debt due to joint tenancy.1 -
So he HAS missed a payment - there is no 'his share / her share'. They are both jointly and severally liable for the whole payment every month.monkey-fingers said:
Because his OH wasn't paying her share.freesha said:
If he has 'never missed a payment', how are there £1.6k rent arrears?Marcus3344 said:My son has a joint debt if £1600 with his ex partner.
To cut a long story short, he’s never missed a payment even though not living there for 9 months.
however he is very well aware he is liable for the debt due to joint tenancy.1 -
Yes, we know this. Read the OP.freesha said:
So he HAS missed a payment - there is no 'his share / her share'. They are both jointly and severally liable for the whole payment every month.monkey-fingers said:
Because his OH wasn't paying her share.freesha said:
If he has 'never missed a payment', how are there £1.6k rent arrears?Marcus3344 said:My son has a joint debt if £1600 with his ex partner.
To cut a long story short, he’s never missed a payment even though not living there for 9 months.
however he is very well aware he is liable for the debt due to joint tenancy.
I quote
"however he is very well aware he is liable for the debt due to joint tenancy."
You even replied to this.
He was paying her, expecting her to pay. She didn't.
2 -
Landlords don't care who (of joint tenants) pays whatever is owing as long as someone does.
And usually go after the one who has been paying and/or whoever has a job, assets etc etc,1 -
It would be sensible just to pay it then sue his ex for his half of the deposit and her share of the rent she didn't pay.Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)1 -
They both have/had liability for the whole lot of rent to landlord. No liability (unless they signed something, v unlikely) to each other. I fear your proposal would fail,pinkshoes said:It would be sensible just to pay it then sue his ex for his half of the deposit and her share of the rent she didn't pay.0 -
I disagree. You and I both know that verbal contracts are legal. And the fact that he had spent months (if not years) paying her monthly, shows that it was an implied contract.theartfullodger said:
They both have/had liability for the whole lot of rent to landlord. No liability (unless they signed something, v unlikely) to each other. I fear your proposal would fail,pinkshoes said:It would be sensible just to pay it then sue his ex for his half of the deposit and her share of the rent she didn't pay.
With a bit of luck, he marked the payments as "Rent" or "Share of rent"0 -
He could only (possibly) claim from the ex. He still has a liability to the landlord.monkey-fingers said:
Yes, we know this. Read the OP.freesha said:
So he HAS missed a payment - there is no 'his share / her share'. They are both jointly and severally liable for the whole payment every month.monkey-fingers said:
Because his OH wasn't paying her share.freesha said:
If he has 'never missed a payment', how are there £1.6k rent arrears?Marcus3344 said:My son has a joint debt if £1600 with his ex partner.
To cut a long story short, he’s never missed a payment even though not living there for 9 months.
however he is very well aware he is liable for the debt due to joint tenancy.
I quote
"however he is very well aware he is liable for the debt due to joint tenancy."
You even replied to this.
He was paying her, expecting her to pay. She didn't.
if the ex has no money, how is he going to get her to pay him?I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.1 -
No, if parties enter into joint and several liability then that legally implies a requirement for them to reimburse each other if somebody pays more than their due share. So pinkshoes' suggestion works.theartfullodger said:
They both have/had liability for the whole lot of rent to landlord. No liability (unless they signed something, v unlikely) to each other. I fear your proposal would fail,pinkshoes said:It would be sensible just to pay it then sue his ex for his half of the deposit and her share of the rent she didn't pay.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


