We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Is a home buyers survey for a small 1 bed flat a waste of money?

It's a top floor flat (2nd floor) and I went to view it last week. Checkout out the windows, had a visual inspection of the tops and bottoms of the walls / corners for damp / mould, had a look for any cracks or fractures along the interior walls etc. I'm not a professional but the flat seems perfectly fine.

It's a tiny little 1 bed flat I reckon the surveyor will be in and out of that place in about 5 minutes and it's going to cost me like £500.

And my thinking is if there is any structural issues then it's the freeholders responsibility to pay and fix it anyway, not mine. So I'm only really concerned with the inside of the flat, which appears totally fine.

If the £500 cost included inspection of plumbing and gas / boiler then I'd pay it, but it doesn't and all he's going to do is walk around looking at the walls / windows and come to the exact same conclusion I have?

Comments

  • RAS
    RAS Posts: 36,198 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It's a top floor flat (2nd floor) and I went to view it last week. Checkout out the windows, had a visual inspection of the tops and bottoms of the walls / corners for damp / mould, had a look for any cracks or fractures along the interior walls etc. I'm not a professional but the flat seems perfectly fine.

    It's a tiny little 1 bed flat I reckon the surveyor will be in and out of that place in about 5 minutes and it's going to cost me like £500.

    And my thinking is if there is any structural issues then it's the freeholders responsibility to pay and fix it anyway, not mine. So I'm only really concerned with the inside of the flat, which appears totally fine.

    If the £500 cost included inspection of plumbing and gas / boiler then I'd pay it, but it doesn't and all he's going to do is walk around looking at the walls / windows and come to the exact same conclusion I have?
    It's the freeholder's responsibility to fix any structural issues and repairs of any shared "facilities".

    You'll be paying for the maintenance and repairs when they send the bill for your portion of the cost. 

    Have you taken advice on the likely costs? Is it proportional to the size of the flat, or does each flat pay equal amounts, or what? Will they need scaffold? When's the roof going to need replacing?
    If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing
  • itsthelittlethings
    itsthelittlethings Posts: 1,499 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Personally you can’t put a price on a surveyor. When I bought my flat all the report really said was “I can’t see the roof and there’s not much storage” but nothing major was flagged.

    Basically, I don’t know.
    Credit card 1800
    Overdraft 250

    EF 50
  • somerandomusername
    somerandomusername Posts: 32 Forumite
    10 Posts Name Dropper
    RAS said:
    It's a top floor flat (2nd floor) and I went to view it last week. Checkout out the windows, had a visual inspection of the tops and bottoms of the walls / corners for damp / mould, had a look for any cracks or fractures along the interior walls etc. I'm not a professional but the flat seems perfectly fine.

    It's a tiny little 1 bed flat I reckon the surveyor will be in and out of that place in about 5 minutes and it's going to cost me like £500.

    And my thinking is if there is any structural issues then it's the freeholders responsibility to pay and fix it anyway, not mine. So I'm only really concerned with the inside of the flat, which appears totally fine.

    If the £500 cost included inspection of plumbing and gas / boiler then I'd pay it, but it doesn't and all he's going to do is walk around looking at the walls / windows and come to the exact same conclusion I have?
    It's the freeholder's responsibility to fix any structural issues and repairs of any shared "facilities".

    You'll be paying for the maintenance and repairs when they send the bill for your portion of the cost. 

    Have you taken advice on the likely costs? Is it proportional to the size of the flat, or does each flat pay equal amounts, or what? Will they need scaffold? When's the roof going to need replacing?
    Well isn't that what the annual service charge is meant to cover anyway? In case there is an issue that needs to be fixed they have the reserve fund to pay for it. My brothers flat for example they stripped off all the cladding and made it EWS1 safe or whatever it's called. He didn't have to pay a penny towards it as the management company had enough funds to cover the refit.
  • RedFraggle
    RedFraggle Posts: 1,458 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Cladding refits have different rules.
    Is there a sink fund? It's not a given. My friend bought a flat in a block with no sink fund at all. My building had about £130k of which £50k was just spent on roof work. Without a sink fund id have had to pay my share of that (about £1k).
    I didn't have a survey but could see roof works were going to be needed. I'm also quite savvy having owned multiple houses. 
    Service charges are intended to cover routine shared costs, that doesn't mean you won't get a section 20 notification of major works and have to chip in your share of the costs. 
    Officially in a clique of idiots
  • Emmia
    Emmia Posts: 6,439 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    We've had to pay our share of works - this year it was about £8k for exterior repainting and other repairs, which included scaffolding.

    We've also had to fork out £2k for a new fire door to comply with updated regulations, £10k to replace windows and a exterior door that was fundamentally rotten.

    We've been here over a decade and in that time there's also been two lots of interior redecoration at ~£2k - £3k a go. Plus our share of plumbing and other small maintenance issues that have arisen.

    There's no sinking fund, so the leaseholders pay when the works are scheduled/required.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.