We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
New FSCS deposit protection limit
Comments
-
This article has just been published so it looks promising https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/article-15273353/Boost-savers-Bank-England-raises-deposit-guarantee-limit-110-000.html
1 -
That's the article already being discussed on the previous page, in which there is no official confirmation, just "the Mail on Sunday understands...."Fatferds12 said:This article has just been published so it looks promising https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/article-15273353/Boost-savers-Bank-England-raises-deposit-guarantee-limit-110-000.html2 -
Comparing the Key Product Information wording of Shawbrook fixes, for non-ISA "If the product is withdrawn from sale you will be able to put more money into your account for a further seven working days." but for ISA "If the product is withdrawn, you can continue to put more money into your account until the expiry of the fixed term"1
-
It has been discussed previously that there is a conflict between this and clause 2.6 of the overarching T&Cs: "We may stop offering a product or refuse to accept deposits for any product at any time". Those who have contacted Shawbrook have been told there are no plans to stop accepting deposits into cash ISA fixes throughout the term, including high value inward ISA transfers, which surely must be the biggest risk for them.jak22 said:Comparing the Key Product Information wording of Shawbrook fixes, for non-ISA "If the product is withdrawn from sale you will be able to put more money into your account for a further seven working days." but for ISA "If the product is withdrawn, you can continue to put more money into your account until the expiry of the fixed term"0 -
To be fair, in the hierarchy of coded language that newspapers use to express these things, "The Mail understands..." is a lot more solid than "sources within the treasury suggest..." or "ministers are considering" etc. It's the sort of language that newspapers use when they've been told as fact that something will be happening by a source in a position to know, who (obviously) won't go on the record before an official announcement is made. So something more than mere speculation, while still falling short of confirmation.masonic said:mta999 said:"The Mail on Sunday understands". So still speculation at this point, and not even willing to state there is a credible source.
I suppose we'll find out for sure soon enough0 -
Hmm, I would have taken "sources within the treasury" to be the more solid phrase. ISTM the real subject matter of the article is the cash ISA limit speculation, with the FSCS limit just being used to segue into it.Aretnap said:
To be fair, in the hierarchy of coded language that newspapers use to express these things, "The Mail understands..." is a lot more solid than "sources within the treasury suggest..." or "ministers are considering" etc. It's the sort of language that newspapers use when they've been told as fact that something will be happening by a source in a position to know, who (obviously) won't go on the record before an official announcement is made. So something more than mere speculation, while still falling short of confirmation.masonic said:mta999 said:"The Mail on Sunday understands". So still speculation at this point, and not even willing to state there is a credible source.
I suppose we'll find out for sure soon enough1 -
It depends what follows it to be honest. "According to sources within the treasury, the chancellor will announce tomorrow..." is pretty solid, "sources within the treasury suggest..." is more than likely kite-flying.masonic said:
Hmm, I would have taken "sources within the treasury" to be the more solid phrase.Aretnap said:
To be fair, in the hierarchy of coded language that newspapers use to express these things, "The Mail understands..." is a lot more solid than "sources within the treasury suggest..." or "ministers are considering" etc. It's the sort of language that newspapers use when they've been told as fact that something will be happening by a source in a position to know, who (obviously) won't go on the record before an official announcement is made. So something more than mere speculation, while still falling short of confirmation.masonic said:mta999 said:"The Mail on Sunday understands". So still speculation at this point, and not even willing to state there is a credible source.
I suppose we'll find out for sure soon enough
But "the Mail understands" is something I'd always take to be towards the top of the hierarchy. It implies a semi-official announcement, one step short of the phenomenon where four newspapers all lead on something that's going to be in the budget, the morning before it happens.
(Oh for the good old days when chancellors had to resign if they mumbled something about the budget's contents within earshot of a journalist ten minutes before they delivered it).1 -
All eyes on the BoE news feed next week then.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
