We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Speeding fine calibration certificate?
flopsy1973
Posts: 715 Forumite
in Motoring
Hi
Got caught speeding on 17 Sep and asked for evidence as I can't remember being flashed. Not sure if reading the calibration certificate right but the inspection is in date but the calibration has expired. See below for cert
Got caught speeding on 17 Sep and asked for evidence as I can't remember being flashed. Not sure if reading the calibration certificate right but the inspection is in date but the calibration has expired. See below for cert
0
Comments
-
What you need to do is show that the device is now over reading by sufficient margin that you were travelling below the speed limit when it erroneously recorded your speed at the stated value.It won't be, as even if it is out of calibration, it won't have drifted that far and can still prove that you were speeding.In all likelihood, if your defence is that the device recorded you as speeding when you were travelling below the limit, the prosecution will bring one of their expensive experts to Court to testify that this could not possibly be the case, and your defence would fail, adding a small fortune to your costs.Unfortunately, there is no directive that a device cannot be used as evidence of speeding once the site calibration expires (which would be a nice "get out of jail free" card....)
I want to go back to The Olden Days, when every single thing that I can think of was better.....
(except air quality and Medical Science
)0 -
It says valid until 18th Jan 2026.The reason you weren’t flashed is that speed camera uses infra-red and can catch you traveling in both directions.1
-
Fixed penalty (assuming you were going fast enough) £100, 3 points, all sorted.Go to court: whole day spent in court, 3 points still, fine bigger plus victim surcharge, costs for an expert witness £600, as you'll still be convicted.Choose.....0
-
It's impossible to challenge these things. The cameras can have all sorts of faults, the mobile ones get banged about and set up wrong... But you can't get the camera to test it, you can't prove anything.The only real defence is to have a camera recording your speedo, and ideally with a GPS recording speed as well.0
-
The guideline on costs for a straightforward trial is c£600. If an expert witness is called, the costs will be much higher.RandomTourist said:Fixed penalty (assuming you were going fast enough) £100, 3 points, all sorted.Go to court: whole day spent in court, 3 points still, fine bigger plus victim surcharge, costs for an expert witness £600, as you'll still be convicted.Choose.....0 -
It's not a mobile camera.ThorOdinson said:It's impossible to challenge these things. The cameras can have all sorts of faults, the mobile ones get banged about and set up wrong... But you can't get the camera to test it, you can't prove anything.
The lat and long of the location are given on the second page.
Put them into google maps, and what's that on the pavement? A big, tall, and very yellow stick in a Welsh urban default, so 20mph zone...
https://maps.app.goo.gl/JMQf4XaZZtcZYWgh6
Approaching that at 9 metres per second, it really ought to have been quite visible for a fair while.
The OP is bang to rights, and challenging the ticket on conspiratorial trivialities will only delay the inevitable, and make it more expensive.
Take the course if offered (likely <31mph), or the fixed penalty (<35mph).
If the speed was too high for a fixed penalty, submit no attempt at justification to the course, simply an apology.
0 -
You've been caught. Get it paid and learn from it1
-
If you're going under the limit you won't get flashed or caught by camera, simple as that. Find any case of a camera falsely reading and the tickets will be squashedThorOdinson said:It's impossible to challenge these things. The cameras can have all sorts of faults, the mobile ones get banged about and set up wrong... But you can't get the camera to test it, you can't prove anything.The only real defence is to have a camera recording your speedo, and ideally with a GPS recording speed as well.Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
Mildly_Miffed said:
It's not a mobile camera.ThorOdinson said:It's impossible to challenge these things. The cameras can have all sorts of faults, the mobile ones get banged about and set up wrong... But you can't get the camera to test it, you can't prove anything.
The lat and long of the location are given on the second page.
Put them into google maps, and what's that on the pavement? A big, tall, and very yellow stick in a Welsh urban default, so 20mph zone...
https://maps.app.goo.gl/JMQf4XaZZtcZYWgh6
Approaching that at 9 metres per second, it really ought to have been quite visible for a fair while.
The OP is bang to rights, and challenging the ticket on conspiratorial trivialities will only delay the inevitable, and make it more expensive.
Take the course if offered (likely <31mph), or the fixed penalty (<35mph).
If the speed was too high for a fixed penalty, submit no attempt at justification to the course, simply an apology.I didn't follow up on the location.That is Pontybodkin which is famous as one of the most lucrative cameras in Wales- "which catches everybody". It is even the first image in this article https://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/10-most-prolific-speed-cameras-31964340 (mind you, it is a xxxxpost article, so likely just clickbait)It is a VECTOR-SR- the type that projects it's own grid onto its video for interpreted speed measurement, with secondary radar. It can also spot if drivers are not wearing seatbelts, or holding a mobile 'phone.I'd argue that they are difficult to spot amongst other street furniture before you are caught, which is the intention!(If you could get a prosecution cancelled easily there are many thousands of others who would be doing the same- if there is one camera in the whole of Wales that would be 100% unchallengeable this one would be it)Best defence is an up to date speed camera database with an alarm, Waze will do.Obviously you can drive at below 20mph all the time that you are in Wales too
I want to go back to The Olden Days, when every single thing that I can think of was better.....
(except air quality and Medical Science
)0 -
The best and totally foolproof defence is to be aware of the speed limit at all times and ensure you don't exceed itfacade said:Best defence is an up to date speed camera database with an alarm, Waze will do.Obviously you can drive at below 20mph all the time that you are in Wales too5
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

