We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Notice of Trial Date

Hi, Im helping my partner deal with DCB legal for stopping in Bristol airport where stopping is not allowed. Defense and witness statement submitted, this Friday we have the trial in county court and pretty scary. I am reading now their witness statement and it is scary.  Any words of advice?

Comments

  • ChirpyChicken
    ChirpyChicken Posts: 1,950 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    why is it scary?
  • Rebeca25
    Rebeca25 Posts: 4 Newbie
    First Post
    Mainly because all the vocabulary and legals are out of our comfort zone and they seem to drop our defence by saying how its their right to put these fines and reinforce them and we agreed to that contract by driving into the airport. My main worry is that they are lawyers and will stammer in front of the judge. I am also confused we have our trial date thisFriday 10th of October but the preliminary hearing on the notice of allocation to the small claims track is on the 22nd of october
  • maxim024
    maxim024 Posts: 14 Forumite
    10 Posts
    edited Today at 4:38PM
    Have you submitted your witness statement?

    If not, but you probably had to already (min. 2 weeks before the hearing)

    - Challenge the witness statement as hearsay.
    - Challenge strict proof of landowner authority.
    - Argue that the signage was insufficient to form a contract with a driver in a moving vehicle at night.
    - Challenge the additional £70 charge as an unenforceable penalty. (If applicable)

  • Gr1pr
    Gr1pr Posts: 9,997 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited Today at 4:46PM
    Rebeca25 said:
    Mainly because all the vocabulary and legals are out of our comfort zone and they seem to drop our defence by saying how its their right to put these fines and reinforce them and we agreed to that contract by driving into the airport.

     My main worry is that they are lawyers and will stammer in front of the judge.

    I am also confused we have our trial date thisFriday 10th of October but the preliminary hearing on the notice of allocation to the small claims track is on the 22nd of october
    You wont find the legal word FINE on any of the paperwork,  because its not allowed 

    Their so called WS is a template 

    Post a redacted picture of the court order where it mentions the deadlines and dates etc that you mentioned 
  • Car1980
    Car1980 Posts: 1,942 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Where is the contract? This is entirely a contract law based claim where they rely 100% on an alleged contract.

    It should be Exhibit Numero Uno.

    How were you expected to read, understand, accept or decline this contract when stopping to read it would incur a charge? 

    You either stop to read it and are charged, or find it impossible to read at driving speed, in the dark, unilluminated and inadvertently stop and are charged. 

    It's literally the contractual version of Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea.



  • Car1980
    Car1980 Posts: 1,942 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited Today at 5:56PM
    My main worry is that they are lawyers and will stammer in front of the judge. 

    A couple of points:

    1. It's only a parking ticket at the end of the day. They're not lawyers, they're advocates. A lawyer wouldn't waste their time on such a trivial matter. DCB are a bailiff company that do a bit of legal work as a side hustle. 

    2. Jake Burgess just churns out that template day in day out. He never actually attends hearings because it's beyond his capabilities.

    3. The judges are used to dealing with litigants in person. They'll guide you and don't expect you say much. I've seen cases where the defendant has said about 3 words in total.

    4. In the grand scheme of things it's only a parking ticket. If you lose, it's "only" a couple of hundred quid. Yes, I know nobody can afford to lose it, but at least you're not Lawrence Fox or Rebekah Vardy!

    5. My son has a stammer. People are generally kind and patient. Remember there is no such thing as perfect speech.
  • Rebeca25
    Rebeca25 Posts: 4 Newbie
    First Post
    Those are the letters we received. We emailed the defence months ago and also the N180 directions questionnaire last May. We had the mediation call as a formality.
  • Rebeca25
    Rebeca25 Posts: 4 Newbie
    First Post
    Sorry I cant load the pictures, but I have a notice of trial date on 10th of October and a notice of allocation to the small claims track (hearing) on 22nd october
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.