We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Pension, Final Salary - My Brain Hurts!

124

Comments

  • LHW99 said:
    The OP is an active member of both the 1/80ths final salary scheme and also the post 2022 career average scheme.

    Also

    Since April 2022, all teachers have been in the career average scheme (CARE). The benefits from that are:
    Accrued more slowly (1/57th per year)

    My understanding is that 1/80 per year is a smaller fraction than 1/57 per year, so CARE would actually accrue more quickly.

    I think it was how the unions were persuaded not to fight the change.

    So true!

    Not sure what average teachers salary is but say £40k then 1/80th is £500 and 1/57th £701.75.

    The trade off being a promotion or two could massively impact the £500.  And it was available, unreduced, at 60 not 67.
  • hugheskevi
    hugheskevi Posts: 4,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 20 September at 11:27AM
    LHW99 said:

    My understanding is that 1/80 per year is a smaller fraction than 1/57 per year, so CARE would actually accrue more quickly.

    The 1/80ths is payable without reduction from age 60, the 1/57 is payable without reduction from age 67. 
    The reduction to take the 1/57 pension from age 60 would be about 29%. That reduces the accrual rate to close to 1/80ths. However, there is no automatic lump sum payable, as there is with the 1/80ths scheme.
    The 1/80ths scheme revalues in line with earnings in-service, whereas the 1/57 scheme is CPI+1.6% in service.
  • The 1/80ths is payable without reduction from age 60, the 1/57 is payable without reduction from age 67. 
    The reduction to take the 1/57 pension from age 60 would be about 29%. That reduces the accrual rate to close to 1/80ths. However, there is no automatic lump sum payable, as there is with the 1/80ths scheme.
    The 1/80ths scheme revalues in line with earnings in-service, whereas the 1/57 scheme is CPI+1.6% in service.
    That 1.6 percent looks trivial, but over 30 years it compounds to a 61% increase.  So if you earn 40k at 37, the pension earned in the year is £702, but by age 67 it has the purchasing power of £1130 today,  if CPI is an accurate reflection of prices.   That's extremely generous.  

    For comparison, the post-2016 universities scheme (USS) has an accrual of 1/75,  it's CPI-linked up to 5%, then half of the chunk from 5-15%, then nothing above,  so if CPI is 10% you get 7.5% so you lose in real terms.  (There is a 3x AP lump sum however).   
  • Vitor
    Vitor Posts: 834 Forumite
    500 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Yeh thanks hugheskevi.... 'take it or lose it' ... how should I have found that out that it existed? -

    In the Teachers’ Pension Scheme it’s worth being clear on two points:

    • If you don’t draw your final salary pension at age 60, you don’t get arrears later. But the pension isn’t “lost” either, it’s still linked to your eventual pensionable salary and, if taken after NPA, normally attracts a late-retirement uplift.

    • Abatement isn’t a blanket “salary + pension can’t exceed full-time pay” rule. It applies only in certain re-employment situations, and the details vary from scheme to scheme.

    So while the final salary link does remain, whether late-retirement factors apply and how abatement bites are things to confirm directly with Teachers’ Pensions, rather than assume from general principles.

  • DRS1
    DRS1 Posts: 1,506 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Vitor said:
    - Yeh thanks hugheskevi.... 'take it or lose it' ... how should I have found that out that it existed? -

    In the Teachers’ Pension Scheme it’s worth being clear on two points:

    • If you don’t draw your final salary pension at age 60, you don’t get arrears later. But the pension isn’t “lost” either, it’s still linked to your eventual pensionable salary and, if taken after NPA, normally attracts a late-retirement uplift.

    • Abatement isn’t a blanket “salary + pension can’t exceed full-time pay” rule. It applies only in certain re-employment situations, and the details vary from scheme to scheme.

    So while the final salary link does remain, whether late-retirement factors apply and how abatement bites are things to confirm directly with Teachers’ Pensions, rather than assume from general principles.

    Based on the document linked earlier I don't think the NPA60 benefits do get a late retirement uplift.  The NPA65 benefits do.

    But I agree the OP should definitely check that and the abatement issue with TPS (and how he would go about claiming the NPA60 benefits now).
  • As to how OP should have known, were they not getting annual statements showing what was payable at 60.

    If it's any consolation there is a similar lack of knowledge in the Civil Service where people work full time beyond 60 where they could have taken partial retirement at 60, worked 3 days a week fotlr the same take home income (pay and pension). 
  • As to how OP should have known, were they not getting annual statements showing what was payable at 60.

    If it's any consolation there is a similar lack of knowledge in the Civil Service where people work full time beyond 60 where they could have taken partial retirement at 60, worked 3 days a week fotlr the same take home income (pay and pension). 
    Staying full time is even dafter than that, take home pay is higher under partial retirement because no NI is paid on the pension part of income. Assuming you can get your part time hours agreed at just under the abatement threshold.
  • LHW99
    LHW99 Posts: 5,323 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    As to how OP should have known, were they not getting annual statements showing what was payable at 60.

    If it's any consolation there is a similar lack of knowledge in the Civil Service where people work full time beyond 60 where they could have taken partial retirement at 60, worked 3 days a week fotlr the same take home income (pay and pension). 

    On the whole (historically at least) the TPS have never sent annual statements for the DB scheme. The initial booklet let you know the accrual rate of 1/80, and apart from a statement of benefits if deferred (and at that time-point), you couldn't learn any more until just before claiming the pension.
    It is really only relatively recently that any sort of calculators have been available.
  • LHW99 said:
    As to how OP should have known, were they not getting annual statements showing what was payable at 60.

    If it's any consolation there is a similar lack of knowledge in the Civil Service where people work full time beyond 60 where they could have taken partial retirement at 60, worked 3 days a week fotlr the same take home income (pay and pension). 

    On the whole (historically at least) the TPS have never sent annual statements for the DB scheme. The initial booklet let you know the accrual rate of 1/80, and apart from a statement of benefits if deferred (and at that time-point), you couldn't learn any more until just before claiming the pension.
    It is really only relatively recently that any sort of calculators have been available.
    My understanding is that it is a requirement. Could be wrong but MyCSP (who run Civil Service pensions) have reported themselves to Pensions Ombudsman as, for a small % of members, they will not be able to issue a statement.
  • peejaydj
    peejaydj Posts: 22 Forumite
    10 Posts
    As to how OP should have known, were they not getting annual statements showing what was payable at 60.

    If it's any consolation there is a similar lack of knowledge in the Civil Service where people work full time beyond 60 where they could have taken partial retirement at 60, worked 3 days a week fotlr the same take home income (pay and pension). 
    Yes  I kept checking my TP  and asking for advice and could see what I was going to get just did not know I had to claim it. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.